0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agorace conditionslemmy.zipimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1805arrow-down121
arrow-up1784arrow-down1imagerace conditionslemmy.zip0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 day agoonly true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
minus-squareratel@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 hours agoI thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agoFortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 hours agoonly if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
minus-squareratel@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 hours agoAh ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
minus-squareouRKaoS@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoI’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!
minus-squareWhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day ago10 PRINT "FARTS" 20 GOTO 10
only true if your language compiles to c. fortran peeps are safe.
I thought it compiles to LLVM intermediate representation and then to the machine code of the requested platform arch. Am I missing something?
Fortran is from 1957, LLVM is from 2003. It’s probably like C where there is a compiler tool chain that goes through LLVM like you describe and others that go directly to executables.
only if you design it using llvm. llvm is pretty new.
Ah ok I was referring to Rust specifically. Thanks!
yeah but rednax wasn’t.
I’m an 80’s/90’s BASIC bitch, so I’m still irrelevant!