No one could have predicted this. /s

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    True, but there have zero incentive to honor such requests. If anything, they have incentive to ignore them, since it’ll just take time, effort and money that they don’t have with no resulting benefit.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      So give up, just don’t do anything!

      I know those weren’t your literal words, but that’s the sentiment.

      It’s the only thing you can do at this point if you gave them your DNA, and it harms nobody to try.

      Listing all the reasons not to bother just seems a bit pointless to me. Especially since they had no real reason to honor the request before.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        No, you’re putting words in my mouth.

        I’m not telling anyone not to bother; I’m outlining how pitiful the state of things.

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      True, but there have zero incentive to honor such requests

      Pretty sure 23andMe is based in California, don’t Cali laws legally require them to delete the data when requested?

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        And what exactly are the repercussions? They go bankrupt, shut down, and now there’s nobody to see any consequences.

    • danA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They’re a California-based company so under the CCPA they must delete your data upon request.

        • danA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          They’re likely going to be sold, not shut down. Whoever buys the company takes on the responsibility.

          If they actually shut down then it shouldn’t be an issue since they’d almost certainly erase everything.

            • danA
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I mean, either they sell it and the buyer has to comply with the law, or they don’t sell it.

                • danA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  They’re a public company and have shareholders… How would they sell it under-the-table?