I wonder if you could analyze internet discussions for an effect.

    • SoupBrick@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Unfortunately, that movie’s main message was about eugenics. I am not arguing that anti-intellectualism is not spreading like a cancer, but that movie is not the best thing to reference.

      • Probius@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I don’t think it ever actually promoted eugenics. It just explored the natural consequences of two facts in a comedic way:

        • Intelligence has a hereditary component to it.
        • Stupid people have more kids.

        It never tries to push any eugenics-based agenda. It would have if they tried to say that dumb people shouldn’t be allowed to have kids, but they never went anywhere near that.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah as the smart child of two dumbfuck parents who can barely read please stop repeating this dumb shit.

          Two smart people don’t always make a smart baby. Two dumb people don’t always make a dumb baby.

          It is eugenics.

          • Probius@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If you automatically assumed that intelligence having a hereditary component to it meant that I was trying to say that all dumb people’s children were also dumb 100% of the time, you might not be as smart as you think.

          • Probius@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If one believes the accuracy of film’s central premise—that the dumb are reproducing at a higher rate than the smart, which will lower the world’s intelligence until idiocy reigns supreme—it’s only natural to want to stop that from happening. From there, it’s not at all that great a leap to begin believing that maybe there should be some kind of policy only allowing intelligent people to reproduce—in other words, sterilize the dumb.

            This is just the author asserting their own absurd leaps in logic as the intended message behind the movie, which it clearly isn’t.

            A 2015 Pew study looked at how many kids that women with postgraduate degrees have given birth to over the past half-century. In 1994, 30 percent of women with a master’s degree or higher were childless, a number that’s since dropped to 22 percent. In 1976, 10 percent of said women had one child, while in 2014 that numbers up to 18 percent; those with two kids rose even more dramatically, from 22 to 35 percent.

            The author draws the wrong conclusion from this data. Just because women with degrees are having more kids now than in the past doesn’t mean that women without degrees haven’t always had more kids than women with degrees. It’s very telling that they never bring those numbers up.

            • SoupBrick@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The issue is the thought that people cannot grow and learn. Regardless of upbringing anybody can choose to persue knowledge. The horrible state of public education is most likely the root cause, in my opinion. The US has chose not to invest in it’s people and now we are seeing the results.

    • Anissem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Shit. I know shit’s bad right now, with all that starving bullshit, and the dust storms, and we are running out of french fries and burrito coverings. But I got a solution.