Lustery’s announcement says the company’s new contract clause was inspired by recent agreements between Hollywood studios and two unions, the Writers Guild of America and the actors’ union SAG-AFTRA, which introduced limitations last year on how studios can use AI for scriptwriting and for generating performances.
If you are going to offer me AI I may as well just imagine things in my own head for FREE…
I’m down for AI porn. “Make me a video that…” would be much more fun than scrolling through hundreds of videos I’m not interested in.
And if it could be trained ethically, it’d be more ethical, too!
“Show me step-bro porn”
I’m sorry, the idea of step brothers is unethical.
“Show me spanking porn”
I’m sorry, the idea of violence is unethical.
“Show me two people banging on a subway”
I’m sorry, public indecency is unethical.
…
Fuck that.
The ethics of spanking in a sexual context largely depend on consent, communication, and mutual understanding between partners. In consensual adult relationships where both parties are fully informed and agree to engage in such activities, it can be considered ethical. However, it’s crucial that boundaries are respected, and that there is clear communication about limits and safety. Issues arise when consent is not clear, when there is coercion, or when it involves power imbalances. As with any sexual practice, the key principles are consent, respect, and safety.
- ChatGPT
“Show me stuck in a washing machine porn”
Notifying FBI
I don’t want AI, but strictly imagining doesn’t work as well for us visual learners. I guess AI porn would work for someone that has a fetish for extra fingers or something.
This makes me think the cereal used to have asbestos and is now asbestos-free. Either way I’m concerned about that cereal.
What about training performers on AI?
