• ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s stunning that each party managed to find a candidate that could lose against the other.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Its not that stunning. In fact, its more common than you’d guess.

      Only Ford could lose to Carter. Only Dukakis could lose to Bush. Only Hillary could lose to Trump. Hindsight 20/20. Foresight blind as a fucking bat.

      • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ford did himself in. Apparently in 1976, American’s didn’t like the fact that the President could commit crimes while in office and get off with a pardon from his former VP. Crimes he was never charged with or convicted of.

        Today, a scandal is like a badge of “honor” and being a convicted criminal and morally bankrupt sleezeball is basically a requirement for the Presidency. At least it is if you’re a Republican.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      79
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If the election was today, Biden would lose. Imagine if Trump wasn’t the nominee for November, the GOP would win the presidency.

      Edit: it’s just reality according to the current polling.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        according to the current polling

        I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: the polls are likely skewed towards the GOP, and it’s thought that this is because of random text/calls, which boomers are more likely to respond to.

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          Is a non-genocidal candidate capable of beating the criminal traitor Trump too much to ask for?

          • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            37
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            There it is again.

            The disconnect that exists is that people don’t see the good things he does. You know, green energy, chips act, unions, drug price controls, student debt relief, telling them to look at marijuana rescheduling, infrastructure building. It just goes on and on. You’re doing mental gymnastics to say B-B-Biden bad! Ciao.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              r2o admitted that he only posts the negative stuff. It’s why he got banned from politics.

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                That could be a point, but the person I was responding to is on the war path of trying to make/change the point of “B B BIden bad”.

            • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              5 months ago

              I never said Biden is bad. He’s doing the bare minimum. Expect more from our politicians.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                I would say that the bare minimum would actually include not actively supporting a genocide, but maybe I’m just out of touch.

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Lol you all caps shouted “YES” agreeing to what I said and literally said “Biden is bad”.

                Bare minimum huh? Back to your mental gymnastics. Biden’s doing fucking great.

                You want more? He doesn’t even have control of the house of representatives. If you want more give him and Dems consistent and resounding victories.

                I think this is where I inform you that Dems have had control of all three (house, Senate, and presidency) for a whooping 4 years of the last 24 years. If you include Bill Clinton, then it’s 6 of the last 32 years. You want more progress? Give Dems consistent and resounding victories. Not a measly half term every second president.

                  • samus12345@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    While it’s obviously not good to have a low approval rating, it also doesn’t tell you whether or not a person will vote for him. I don’t approve of him, but will still vote for him because there’s no other viable non-fascist alternative.

                • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Lol you all caps shouted “YES” agreeing to what I said and literally said “Biden is bad”.

                  My apologies, I post anything critical of Biden and the centrist rage comes out of the woodwork to defend him. I got my comments mixed up.

                  What should Biden do differently to run away with the change of winning re-election?

                  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    I got my comments mixed up.

                    Fucking lol dude. That you admit it in one thread, but then try to beat around the bush and deny your deep seated hatred in another doesn’t help you. People can see through it and call you out. That you only admit it in a different chain doesn’t matter. You’re playing games, shouting it in one chain and then denying it another. This doesn’t help you at all.

                    Have to point out your projection of “rage”. You are raging, so you project it.

                    And then you play the game, after I listed off all the good things he did, of asking me what he should do differently to change? Do you mean chance? Whatever, all you’re doing it playing games. Any answer will be met with mental blackflips for whatever game. Ok I said it before, ciao

            • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Expanding the oil industry and shutting down strikes then giving them a pittance isn’t good. Liberals keep lying ig, maybe if you lie hard enough biden will stop being a piece of shit

              /s nothing and no one will stop him from being a piece of shit, telling blatant lies isn’t gonna get people to like him

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Whether we like it or not, gas prices play an outsized role. Have to do that while we get some rail infrastructure up, gas milage up, EVs up and the green energy to go with that. And guess who wants to kill all that?

                On unions: https://youtu.be/EM6jMtG_MB8

                And way to ignore all the other points.

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you think polling relates to reality then look into polling and how it doesn’t.

          • nexguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            “Polls have “called” elections correctly 78 percent of the time” according to that article. Just because they are more accurate than in another time frame does not mean they are accurate overall. This is an incredibly poor rate in the larger picture. Independent groups are notoriously hard to poll and they are the ones that decide elections. If it’s a landslide then of course the poll will be correct. Completely unreliable in close elections. However they make excellent time filters for news networks.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              “Polls have “called” elections correctly 78 percent of the time” according to that article. Just

              Maybe you should just read their argument as to why this is a garbage metric. Especially if you are arguing they don’t even “relate to reality.”

              If always predicting who will win is the requirement for polls, the problem isn’t the polling itself, but your understanding of what a poll means and how statistics work.

              • nexguy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Polls only predict well in places where you don’t need polls… hence their 78% success rate. What is their rate in closer elections? Likely right at 50%…useless.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The article talks about this and why it’s a bad metric. If you’re going to ignore their descriptive argument, you’ll just ignore my less than descriptive argument here.

                  But rest assured that at least part of the problem here is that you don’t understand statistics and probability.

              • candybrie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                This is a thread where someone made the statement “Trump would win if the election was today.” based on polls. You said yourself, that’s not what polls are for. Take it up with the person who is misusing the poll to make definitive statements like that rather than the person saying you can’t trust the polls for that.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Both that poster and this one can be wrong.

                  The difference is that the other poster is just conflating will with favored and it’s kind of pedantic to argue with that.

                  This poster is claiming that they are no relationship with reality, which is just blatantly wrong.

                  • candybrie@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    The reason people go to “No relationship with reality” is because many people use the polls to say “will” instead of “favored” or conflate “will” and “favored.” When that’s the standard you are often presented, of course you are going to come to conclusion polling doesn’t have all that much to do with reality. Because it isn’t that predictive. Especially when you’re looking at things where we take this somewhat fuzzy number and turn it into a binary yes or no while the cloud of possibilities comfortably encompasses both outcomes.

                    So when talking to some making definitive statements about the outcome of an election based on polls, how they are using polls only has a tenuous relationship to reality.

        • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          5 months ago

          You really think Biden would win the election if it was held today? Have you not been paying attention at the work he still needs to do to win?