• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unlike the previous bullshit they threw everywhere (3D screens, NFTs, metaverse), AI bullshit seems very likely to stay, as it is actually proving useful, if with questionable results… Or rather, questionable everything.

    • WheelchairArtist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      if it only were AI and not just llms, machine learning or just plain algorithms. but yeah let’s call everything AI from here on. NFTs could be useful if used as proof of ownership instead of expensive pictures etc

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        The NFT as ownership should really become the standard. Instead of having any people “authorizing” yadadada it’s done completely by machine and traceable.

        No middlemen needed. Just I own x, this says I own x. I can sell you x, and you get ownership of x immediately. No “waiting 45 days to close” or “2 day transaction close” or even “title search verification.” Too many middlemen benefitting from the current system to allow NFT to replace them though. That’s the actual challenge.

        • whats_a_refoogee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, someone gains access to your device and sends themselves the NFT that proves ownership of your house.

          What do you do? Do you just accept that since they own the NFT, that means they own the house? Probably not. You’ll go through the legal system, because that’s still what ultimately decides the ownership. I bet you’ll be happy about middle men and “waiting 45 days to close” then.

          • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The legal system needs to enforce ownership and recognise the blockchain as the official ownership registry.

        • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nfts will creep in slowly as efficiency gains are realized. They are already being used for airline tickets.

            • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Previously you’ve not been able to transfer tickets without third party help. Nor could issuers participate in the profits in the secondary market.

              • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not like it couldn’t have been done before without NFTs (Steam cards come to mind), my guess is that there wasn’t any “interest” or “pressure” from high up to do that.

                  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It would be an issue if every place that cared about those cards crashed. Let’s use a real world example: Decentraland and Vault Hill. Both offer similar services, a “virtual reality metaverse”, not unlike VR Chat or Second Life. Both allow you to buy marketplace items in the form of NFTs, which go straight to your wallet.

                    So far, so good. But, right now, neither has any plans to accept the other’s NFTs. I can prove I own something from another game, but the game itself doesn’t care. I also can’t buy Decentraland stuff with VHC tokens, nor Vault Hill items with MANA, which makes them rather centralized.

                    As soon as either company crashes and goes bankrupt, everything connected will become useless and lose most or all value. Thus, blockchain wouldn’t fix the issue.

          • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            A single airline in Argentina is experimenting with it in partnership with a bullshit travel company. Hardly the proof that NFTs make any sense anywhere. And of course, the only places this story is getting traction is the blockchain hype blogs, which is red flag #2 and #3.

            • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s one example of NFTs in real business. Need more?

              • Walmart tracks their supply chain using blockchain.
              • Starbucks loyalty scheme is NFT based
              • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Odysey isn’t Starbuck’s loyalty program, it’s invite only unless you want to join the wait list, and it’s openly called an experiment at its launch in December 2022.

                NTFs are different to blockchain, so you’re just muddying the waters for yourself with the Walmart thing. Lots of companies do chain of custody things with what you’d call blockchain. It’s been that way for over a decade now. Because it’s low transaction volume, no moronic “proof of…” nonsense, etc. Just hashes signing hashes at different points throughout the supply chain.

                This isn’t the “win” the NFT hype weirdos are desperately hoping for.

                • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Facebook started as invite only. Great for an exclusive, loyal customer.

                  NFTs are different to blockchain, so you’re just muddying the waters for yourself with the Walmart thing

                  Each item is represented by an NFT on the Walmart blockchain. The innovation in the chain of custody is that everyone is verifiably using the same database. It’s a permissioned database, so it’s proof of authority.

                  https://hbr.org/2022/01/how-walmart-canada-uses-blockchain-to-solve-supply-chain-challenges

                  Private keys sign hashes. Hashes cannot sign hashes because there is no associated private key.

    • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a programmer and 3D artist getting almost instant art for reference and using chat GPT to help me solve complex coding problems has sped up production significantly. Theirs even plugins that generate and texture 3D models for you now which means I can do way more by myself.