The former National Enquirer’s secret agreement with Donald Trump is shocking, even by the sensational standards of his former publication.
Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker’s testimony in Donald Trump’s hush money trial this week revealed the underhanded tactics his publication used to defend the former president, flagrantly violating not only mainstream journalism ethics rules, but even the more lurid standards typical of tabloids like his.
“I knew the National Enquirer was slimy, but I didn’t know they were this slimy,” said Kelly McBride, the senior vice president and chair of the Craig Newmark Center for Ethics and Leadership at the non-profit Poynter Institute. “It is so far outside the practice of journalism that it’s hard for me to even imagine that this was happening.”
In testimony this week during Trump’s trial in New York City, the former CEO of National Enquirer’s former parent company explained in stunning detail how he agreed to act as “eyes and ears” for Trump’s campaign, purchasing the rights to stories in order to suppress them, and even outright fabricating negative stories about Trump’s opponents.
“I wanted to protect my company, I wanted to protect myself, and I also wanted to protect Donald Trump,” Pecker said about why he released a false public statement about his publication’s “catch and kill” agreement to purchase and bury Karen McDougal’s story about her alleged monthslong affair with Trump
even outright fabricating negative stories about Trump’s opponents
Did this fucker just testify in court that he committed libel?
Probably past the statute of limitations.
deleted by creator
He was granted immunity in exchange for his testimony. That’s why he’s bearing it all. He admitted to a lot of illegal activity committed on behalf of Trump. His testimony is a hell of a read.
I doubt they can grant immunity against civil action. Maybe the legal consequences, or they’ll cover any libel damages.
Good point.
It’s a tabloid, that’s kinda what they do. But, that’s like saying The Onion is guilty of libel. No one should reasonably expect it to be real.
No one should reasonably expect it to be real.
Except the Onion professes to be sarcastic. Tabloids suggest what they are saying is at worst, rumors.
But that’s absolutely irrelevant when you admit you deliberately lied in writing in order to influence the public’s perception of someone through deception. That’s just a fucking crime.
NAL but libel would be being passed off as truth whereas rumors may or may not be truth. Rumors are possibility, not gospel hence why it isn’t a crime.
I’m pretty sure I couldn’t legally get away with publishing an article in the local paper about how “it’s a rumor that WindyRebel is a pedophile.”
Straight up like that, probably not. If you phrased it differently and under an article about pedophiles and mentioned, “it’s rumored that these people (list names) may be pedophiles as reported from anonymous sources” then I bet you could.
It’s dumb, but phrasing matters.
Talk to Carol Burnett about that. She will tell you otherwise.
It’s so funny that the man who pushed the “fake news” narrative was in bed with the National Enquirer — a publication that’s literally the definition of fake news
Every accusation is an admission of guilt with this shit bag.
Erm, we all knew this. We said it time and time again. Now we are endlessly confirming what we knew while the GOP sit back let’s the infighting continue.
This election is not being fought through the candidates. It’s all about making the dems turn on themselves. Everyone refuses to wise up and instead gets more entrench.
Where are all the repubs? Where is the_donald?
I imagine they sit behind the scenes feeding red meat about Palestine and now the rest of us are just along for the ride.
Yes, NBC. It just revealed it for the first time this week.
If you don’t count the time David Pecker just admitted the whole thing in 2018.
THANK YOU. I thought I was going crazy hearing this all again, with every news story acting like it was unheard of
This has been going on since Confidential magazine in the 1950s. It’s not right, but it’s nothing new.
What do you know, it was projection AGAIN
Some worry that mainstream outlets will be collateral damage too, even though mainstream outlets would never tolerate even a fraction of the kind of behavior Pecker described. Trump and his allies have falsely accused mainstream news outlets of doing exactly what Pecker admitted he did for Trump, and Trump’s lawyers in court argued — inaccurately — that Pecker described standard journalism practices.
They project because people expect others in a similar position to have similar ethics and values, it’s also why on the other side of the spectrum they’re always pardoning those who wronged them, they can’t comprehend that it’s possible to just be that scummy.
If someone is reading the National Enquirer and thinks it’s actual news, they are already an idiot and nothing revealed in this trial is going to smarten them up.
In the 80s, the National Enquirer had a ‘seance’ to ask the ghost of Marilyn Monroe if someone had murdered her and who the murderer was. They then reported this as if it wad an actual source and named Bobby Kennedy the killer. It’s not like this is a real news source in any way, and it never has been.That’s not the issue. The issue is that they were buying peoples’ silence.
Sounds like this Pecker needs to be tried for election interference himself.
Pecker by name eh?
