• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    A persons inability to differentiate between slightly progressive policies and communism, is a gigantic blood red flag indicating that they are a trash person and not worth talking to.

    The most fair but unfavourable (according to them) interpretation of his policies would be socialist, to be a communist he would have to have been a dictator who seized power with force rather than democratically elected. But honestly it’s debatable about whether or not the policies he is proposing go far enough to really be in the realm of socialist. It’s basically just left wing progressive.

    If it weren’t for the fact that he was American no one would be batting an eye. Come to Europe and say those things and everyone would be “well yeah, obviously”.

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      to be a communist he would have to have been a dictator who seized power with force rather than democratically elected.

      Communism and dictatorship have nothing to do with each other.

      • 鳳凰院 凶真 (Hououin Kyouma)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Communism is revolutionary, Socialism can be reformative.

        In the context of the United States, Democratic Socialism is perfectly compatible with the constitution and the ideals of freedom and democracy; Communism, on the other hand, requires overthrowing the existing institutions which make it incompatible.

        Most historical “Communist” movements are vanguardist, and vanguardism doesn’t end well, they end up being authoritarian.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The one thing that communism and dictatorship have in common is that the one pretty much requires a revolution and the other often appears after a revolution.

        They have similar origin stories.

        The problem with revolutions is that revolutions need a strong man to rally around who can quickly make decisions without compromise and who is in close to complete power. A democratic revolution would not happen, since it’s not fast and decisive enough. But when the revolution is done and that same strongman is still in power, and he gets to decide how the new government is run, only very few of them are capable of handing the power over to a democratic government. And if you run a government like a revolution we tend to call that dictatorship.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If Mamdani is a communist, he’s clearly the least ambitious communist that I’ve ever heard of. What he’s asking for is just basic services of a city to work and be affordable.