She looks like dog the bounty hunter
Freedom of religion does not mean you can infringe other peoples rights just because your religion tells you to.
Get fucked Kim Davis
The audacity of Karens everywhere, ugh. So many of them. All of these smug little Karens think they have to personally approve all aspects of their job, instead of, you know, shutting the hell up and doing their JOB. Without any protest and any comments, thank you very much.
It’s like those entitled and self-important male pharmacists in some states thinking they get to be a moral check on decisions made by a patient and a doctor. Count out the pills and ring it up, FFS.
If you want to be even more outraged, I believe this “brave defender of the sanctity of marriage” has been divorced 4 times now and is also a “born again” Christian meaning these are, to her, newly found beliefs that she’s trying to force on everyone else while she doesn’t even abide by them in her own personal life.
It’s almost expected that these people are raging hypocrites. It’s fairly standard Karen behavior.
Stupid potato-faced cunt.
Lots of billboard space on that fivehead for a Swastika scar.
My religion requires free access to ganja, any law interfering with that is a violation of my religious freedom!
Davis then appealed, claiming that she should have been able to cite as a defense her right to the free exercise of religion under the Constitution’s First Amendment.
If practicing your faith requires you to illegally block someone else practicing their faith then no, you don’t get to use that as a defense. Your First Amendment rights do not supercede other peoples First Amendment rights.
This is probably why the court declined to hear it. Her claim is so absurd that it doesn’t mean the minimum requirement for them to overturn Obergefell. They are probably waiting on another case to come along with a more reasoned argument.
You nailed it with that last sentence. Based on their recent (emergency and normal) rulings, that’s the plan.
No need to demean her looks when there are so many other reasons. The fact that she refused to do her job because of her faith, or that she thought that her beliefs were somehow more important than the people that she refused to help. Ugly down to the bone, a hateful shitbird.
Sure, but like, just look at her.
She’s so evil it’s making her look evil.
You can be damn sure she doesn’t have any friends with any fashion sense.
Personally I think her fascist sense is the bigger problem.
I mean, yes, absolutely. But I replied in a comment thread about how she looks so was just following the topic. This woman is the definition of “frumpy”.
I was trying to make a joke about how fascist sounds kinda like fashion, didnt consider that it may be my dialect being scuffed.
That bitch has been married like 5 times
Just because she doesn’t respect the sanctity of marriage doesn’t mean she shouldn’t be allowed the protections and privileges it grants
Your 15 minutes of game is over, Kim Davies. Stop trying to milk it. Go back under your bridge, you miserable little troll.
Every lawsuit is another two years of speaking engagements with far-right Christian outlets!
yea she doesnt have money on her own, shes primarily bankrolled by a right wing group who has the cash for all those lawsuit filings.
Well that’s good news in a sea of shit
the defense attorney: my client “now faces crippling monetary damages based on nothing more than purported hurt feelings”
Which was quite literally the reasoning behind going out of your way to block someone else you don’t even know nor will interact with beyond the 3 mins of paperwork you’re required by law to do, from getting married.
Time to pay up for being a bitch.
Huh? Why?? I mean, yeay!!! But these justices…? What do they have in store for us 😒
That was my first thought too. On the heels of the “war on judges,” and Trump dragging SCOTUS into his battle with the appeals court on Friday, followed by a small group of Dems suddenly going rogue and caving on the shutdown, which seems so bizarre since the circuit court ruling for SNAP to be paid in full was also made on Sunday.
Then today, Trump again demanding the Supreme Court just undo what two lower court judges have now decided, after an emergency stay was granted by a democratically elected justice on Friday, specifically so the final decision could be made by the lower court, and now this very unexpected decision by conservative justices. What in the fuck is actually going on?
Like if I thought conservative SCOTUS justices actually gave a fuck about trying not to appear biased to the public, I would say they seem to be making a very strong point to do so with this decision. If that’s what this is, then yeah, it makes me nervous about wtf they have up their sleeve? Like what could possibly come next, that they would offer us this concession like some kind of deranged love bombing?
Like I wish I lived in a country where I could celebrate this, and trust that a decision like this was made without any ulterior motive or strategy in mind, but I don’t. Fuck I hate this walking on eggshells bullshit.
You don’t have to make same sex marriage illegal if you just throw gays in prison for existing and being antifa, or whatever they would try to say
Modern problems need Spanish inquisition solutions, huh? 😒
i wouldnt call suddenly dems going rogue, it was most likely orchestrated by schumer, because these dems arnt up for re-election in the midterms. fetterman is pretty much a known conservative so, his was obvious. its kinda obvious it was convenient was ready to open up, and then opposing the other votes.
Because the supreme court is extremely ideologically mixed. You have the 3 liberals who are fairly similar. But then you’ve got Thomas and Alito who are far right, and able to believe whatever they’ve been materially incentivised to believe. You’ve got Kavinaugh who is a classic New England conservative fuckup. Kennedy and Gorsuch surely have their own distinct beliefs, but they’re not really interesting enough for me to have heard what those beliefs are. Then there’s Barrett who is certainly ideologically interesting, and has affiliation with a catholic cult and firmly believes that marriage is the foundation of society.
Also, there’s been a long conservative backlash to stare decisis that’s the reason we’re even in this position. It used to be basically unheard of for a ruling to be overturned unless it was egregiously misdecided like Dred Scott. While traditional ideologies of the court are basically shot for decades thanks to a massive conspiracy against the united states by groups like the heritage foundation, court decisions aren’t yet wholly at their whims.
With the exception of Roberts though (who was on a steering committee but claims he was never a member) all of the conservative justices were members of the Federalist society.
On Friday at the annual conference for the Federalist society, the deputy AG gave a speech attacking the Bar association and declaring a war on judges for targeting conservatives with judicial activism.
Kavanaugh and Barrett also spoke about being under siege and standing strong with your conservative values in the face of withering criticism.
That is such a typical conservative cult “it’s us vs them” bullshit tactic to preemptively paint themselves as the victim even though they hold the upper hand in every possible way.
I would say not every conservative member of the Senate has the same set of values, but we’ve seen over and over again that they will go against their own values in order to further Trump’s agenda. It’s not always clear if it’s out of true loyalty or a sense of fear about what will happen to them if they get out of line.
Whatever it is, when they start pulling that us vs them bullshit, it’s hard to believe they won’t all revert back to trying to help overthrow the government.
https://www.axios.com/2025/11/09/doj-blanche-war-activist-judges-dc-bar-associations
Oh absolutely, but knowing their ideologies as human beings gives you the power to wedge their camps apart. Sorry I’d forgotten the name of the federalist society. It also helps to know how they’ll fall on issues.
Of the 6 right wing justices all are opposed to the enlightenment ideals that our nation was founded on, but how and why are important strategical information.
We on the left tend to see those we oppose as a monolith rather than a coalition that could splinter into our level of infighting if pushed in the wrong way. In a similar vein we are also capable of forming a unified coalition that actually affects change in accordance with our wills
I think they’re always on the verge of splintering, and we’ve seen that happen several times already between Epstein and the Heritage Foundation supporting Tucker Carlson.
But I think people like Peter Thiel are also constantly controlling and manipulating people within both the democratic and Republican parties on order to keep themselves afloat.
They can and do throw endless amounts of money at anyone they need to help them gain control in just about any situation, but they also strongly rely on that cult/“family” strategy to keep their base reigned in. We’re a united “family,” but the family has to accept that any member can be thrown under the bus by the paternal figures in control. For the good of the family, of course.
I bet a few of them probably met a gay person or have one in their family now so they decided to pass. Although, I know they are dying to take away another one of our rights so I’m as puzzled as you are.
Conservatives: Gays want to destroy the sanctity of marriage!
Also conservatives;
That news made me happy
Do her eyebrows shrink as her hate grows?
