• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean… you know that you can buy batteries today, and they’re much better than the ones you could buy a decade ago?

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      The point is that on a regular basis there are articles about some amazing new battery breakthrough, but it never leaves the lab.

        • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Tech illiterate media writing hype articles. Repeats yearly also with flying cars or vacuum tube trains.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Most progress isn’t made in sudden huge jumps, but small incremental improvements.

          When pubsci articles promise a breakthrough, remember:

          • it takes a long time to bring such research to market (think ~decade)
          • most breakthroughs are only applicable to narrow niches or work under specific conditions
          • real-life results will usually be worse than lab results
          • startups have incentives to make their research appear as important as possible

          But instead of waiting for huge breakthroughs, just look at the progress made in commercially available batteries. There have been many improvements in cost & charge density.