• Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So what is the response? I feel like these clips are great. But if he makes a great point after, isn’t it setting a trap where you share this and the response is his rebuttal which could be good or bad

    • Grilipper54@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As the other person said he ends up saying he still doesn’t like it but there is still a challenge. The reason Charlie says it’s reaffirmed in Mathew about the gays is because everything the student brings up is the old testament and Jesus already died to erase those sins. Bringing up Leviticus trying to make a point doesn’t work if you believe in the new testament.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      9 hours ago

      His response, and I’m not joking, when all of his arguments against gay marriage were defeated in that debate, was, “well, I still don’t like it.”

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yea I just watched the whole thing. One of my favorite things I’ve heard recently is people arguing if Charlie was a good debater or not. One person just said “did he ever once change his mind?” There’s one a decade. Charlie was not debating. What pisses me off though is how little material there is for times like this to repost. Sure there’s content but everybody on the left checks out and doesn’t bother to archive anything worthwhile.