• SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I know, but it’s hard to find a good example with exactly that text. And I have no clue where I’ve hidden my calligraphy stuff. At least it doesn’t contain a lowercase s, so it should be somewhat fine.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And I have no clue where I’ve hidden my calligraphy stuf

      Le excuse maxima

      What’d you need “calligraphy stuff” for?

      I really haven’t written jack shit in years except on digital so excuse the shittiness but I think that shittiness makes it a rather good example of casual writing.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I thought the discussion was about legibility in general, not the exact typeface. My bad.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minim_(palaeography)

          Since the typeface is standardised it highlights the issue, whereas when you write manually, you can use slightly different spacing (like making the u wider) so it’s more easily legible.

          • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No harm done. I was just trying to make clear that people a long time ago weren’t complete idiots trying to write as unintelligible as possible. The examples further above were intentionally made to be as hard as possible to read, but not because people back then didn’t figure out how not to be knobs yet.