Your prose comes across as deliberately nice and tolerant, but that only highlights how shaky your stance is. You frame “tolerance” as though it excuses supporting Charlie Kirk. It doesn’t. Using tolerance to shield a bigot and a racist is not a virtue, it’s complicity.
Opposing Kirk’s rhetoric isn’t hatred. It’s simply refusing to let prejudice masquerade as principle.
Also, to be clear I never ment that charlie Kirk ever admitted or had someone committed to a facility. But he is on record saying that homeless people and transgenders should all be committed to mental health facilities.
@mechoman444 If he is “on record” with statements about committing people to institutions, please share some links and I will be happy to read them. I might agree or disagree depending on the information provided.
My “prose” is just the way I speak. I don’t care if you find me tolerant or not. Tolerance is not something I strive for, nor is hatred or bigotry.
I would submit that Kirk’s commentary and opinions are no more hatred and vitriol than your own. You are just on opposite sides. #truth
@luyapapi If you come to this conclusion, you have to be very close to the Nazis.
Charlie Kirks ideology was way more hateful and anti-human.
You are a thinly veiled troll. #truth
Your faked civility in writing would be something to compliment, but we live in the age of chatbots, so it’s questionable if these skills are yours.
@DerGiga@mechoman444 If you people understood how silly it sounded to competent people for you to compare someone like Charlie Kirk to the Nazi regime…It would be comical if it wasn’t so disturbing. What you don’t understand is that your hyperbole undermines your position.
You are trying so hard to vilify people that you go to the furthest extreme of inhumanity instead of comparing them to less evil people. It is such a jump that it makes me laugh. You would be more effective with less.
Your prose comes across as deliberately nice and tolerant, but that only highlights how shaky your stance is. You frame “tolerance” as though it excuses supporting Charlie Kirk. It doesn’t. Using tolerance to shield a bigot and a racist is not a virtue, it’s complicity.
Opposing Kirk’s rhetoric isn’t hatred. It’s simply refusing to let prejudice masquerade as principle.
Also, to be clear I never ment that charlie Kirk ever admitted or had someone committed to a facility. But he is on record saying that homeless people and transgenders should all be committed to mental health facilities.
@mechoman444 If he is “on record” with statements about committing people to institutions, please share some links and I will be happy to read them. I might agree or disagree depending on the information provided.
My “prose” is just the way I speak. I don’t care if you find me tolerant or not. Tolerance is not something I strive for, nor is hatred or bigotry.
I would submit that Kirk’s commentary and opinions are no more hatred and vitriol than your own. You are just on opposite sides. #truth
@luyapapi If you come to this conclusion, you have to be very close to the Nazis.
Charlie Kirks ideology was way more hateful and anti-human.
You are a thinly veiled troll. #truth
Your faked civility in writing would be something to compliment, but we live in the age of chatbots, so it’s questionable if these skills are yours.
@mechoman444
@DerGiga @mechoman444 If you people understood how silly it sounded to competent people for you to compare someone like Charlie Kirk to the Nazi regime…It would be comical if it wasn’t so disturbing. What you don’t understand is that your hyperbole undermines your position.
You are trying so hard to vilify people that you go to the furthest extreme of inhumanity instead of comparing them to less evil people. It is such a jump that it makes me laugh. You would be more effective with less.