A new layer of security for certified Android devices
android-developers.googleblog.com
Starting in 2026 and in select countries first, Android apps must be registered to a verified developer in order to be installed.
      • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        5·
        3 days ago

        Nah man it was good. Until recently Android was a pretty nice experience, and the shitty parts weren’t even really Android’s fault. Lack of software updates and being unable to switch to another Android distro? You can blame the stupid decisions of ARM for that.

  • kadu@lemmy.worldEnglish
    37·
    4 days ago

    Guess I’ll buy a Fairphone, use whatever is the latest update before this crap, and ride it until it dies or global warming takes us, whichever comes first.

    I’m not buying hardware that interferes with what software I can run.

  • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    101·
    3 days ago

    What sucks about this is most people can’t do anything about it. Open, custom rom / Linux friendly smartphones aren’t widely available. You’re pretty much screwed if you are somewhere other than EU or North America.

    The most you could do is raise money for an iPhone to at least have software support for longer, since at that point there is no other difference between the two. Or you can buy a feature phone if you really don’t want to deal with the Apple tax and use your phone for basic stuff anyway.

    Edit: There is another option, FOSS devs can rely on PWAs and you can switch to using those until they are also taken away.

      • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        4·
        3 days ago

        None of them seem very good, mobile Linux hasn’t been around for very long so the ecosystem is very immature. But tome it seems like your best bet would be buying a Volla phone or a Fairphone with Ubuntu Touch pre-installed. I don’t know how well waydroid works though.

        • FizzyOrange@programming.devEnglish
          3·
          3 days ago

          mobile Linux hasn’t been around for very long

          lol people have been trying to make Linux on mobile since at least the N95 18 years ago. Android is the only success story and that’s not really “mobile Linux” in the same way that most people think of it. The fact that Android is running on Linux is almost completely hidden from apps.

    • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      11·
      4 days ago

      Has its shortcomings unfortunately…

      E.g. even though most of my important contacts don’t exclusively rely on Whatsapp any more, the alternative that has established itself as a kind of consensus is Signal, which is only available via Playstore, if I’m not mistaken.
      Same is true for my banking app that is needed for my day-to-day bank account.
      Same is also true for governmental service apps or the ID app to authenticate once before e.g. being able to use a new SIM card.

      List goes probably on, these are just the things that have come spontaneously to my mind.

      This complete reliance on OS’s from a private companies (Apple not being better) with their own agenda sucks.
      And LineageOS isn’t the solution it has been a few years back any more, I am afraid… :-(

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netEnglish
    71·
    4 days ago

    This is only for certified devices so if you’re using custom mods nothing will change.

    For open source Android devs it means that now they will have to hand Google their data or people with stock android won’t be able to install their apps.

  • zeezee@slrpnk.netEnglish
    6·
    4 days ago

    They’re saying that

    For student and hobbyist developers

    We’re committed to keeping Android an open platform for you to learn, experiment, and build for fun. We recognize that your needs are different from commercial developers, so we’re working on a separate type of Android Developer Console account for you.

    but I wonder how is the device going to tell between these different types of APKs? Like it already says it’s an untrusted source will it just say “hobbyist or student package” when you install? and is basically just changing the text really gonna improve security?

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.netEnglish
      9·
      4 days ago

      It will either allow installation or reject the app. You simply won’t be able to install an app from banned/unverified developer.

  • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zipEnglish
    3·
    4 days ago

    It’s not super clear from the post whether this means that you have to pay for a developer account. It says there will be a new type of account for students and hobbyists?

      • FizzyOrange@programming.devEnglish
        2·
        4 days ago

        Yeah they meant is that going to stay the case or will there be a new free account type?

        I don’t think it makes any difference. Money isn’t the issue.