• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Frankly, I do think it’s worthy of tanking the stock, it’s just a really bad sign that the leadership doesn’t understand that ‘old-fashioned’ is key to their brand.

    The ‘gone woke’ criticism is stupid, but it is a real head scratcher that Cracker Barrel thinks they should go all in on modern minimal design when their whole schtick is ‘old country store’. They are relatively free of competitive pressure in that niche, and yet they go to a bland logo at odds with their niche.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Frankly, I do think it’s worthy of tanking the stock,

      Because they changed the logo? Who gives a shit?

      If it’s a good restaurant, why the fuck would it matter if the sign looks slightly different.

      Y’all are fucking weird.

      • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You don’t buy and sell stocks based on whether they make good food.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        As a restauraunt they are “ok”.

        Their unique draw is as an “experience”, a folksy old-fashioned restaurant and country store. Chasing the modern minimalist design sentiment is a troubling sign of forfeiting their marketing advantage over an otherwise crowded market of other generic restaurants.

        Now if that ‘old-fashioned’ was failing and the restauraunts were just a place where a few senior citizens go but is mostly a ghost town, I could see an urgency. Like last time I went to a K&W, you just had like a dozen people, with a surprisingly high number of people toting around some medical equipment. However, in my experience Cracker Barrel has been pretty busy still.