• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    even without AI, to me tab groups are already feature creep bloat in browsers. do people really put that much effort into organizing tabs?

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I like the tab groups. I use them often at work to group an issue with related tabs and my attempts at solving it. Also makes it easier to pause work on one problem and work on something else because I have the tabs grouper and know exactly where to go back.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like the tab groups.

        And nobody should stop you installing an extension that provides tab groups. I agree with the other commentator that some features can be left to extensions and don’t need to be part of the core web browser, though.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          True, but I’m not sure that an extension would have the necessary access to manipulate the browser like that. I don’t think it should. A malicious extension could do horrible things.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m not sure that an extension would have the necessary access to manipulate the browser like that.

            I don’t know if they still do but they used to have. That, however, is something to discuss with the genius decision makers at Mozilla who decide to break extension APIs every couple of years. Firefox on Android still hasn’t recovered from last time.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, but I think the idea of a second layer of organization to tabs is a wonderful idea. Maybe not a gig of RAM to sort them, sure.

    • hisao@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      You probably look at tabs as something inherently transient. In my tab group powered workflow a lot of tabs are persistent between browser restarts and stay open at all times. To try to formalize it, there is a set of core tabs that are permanently open, and there are transient tabs are opened and closed from those core tabs. Before tab groups I used “Tree Style Tab” extension but I like tab groups more. It’s especially cool tab groups are integrated well with containers so that you can have for example I2P tab group tied to I2P container configured to use I2P proxy port to automatically browse all tabs opened within group through your I2P proxy port.

    • Mr. Satan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes, especially at work. Different tasks, different tab groups. Once the task is done, the group dies. Really useful when working on multiple tasks at “the same time”.

      Pair that with multi account containers and temporary containers and it’s a godsend tool for web dev.

      Now does that need AI in any capacity? Absolutely not! I’m more upset that they’re even considering such thing because ir sounds utterly useless. A browser should do the browser thing and get out of my way.

    • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      For work at any given point I have 17-20 tabs open. It’s totally useful for me to sort them into tabs to cut out the “noise” when I’m doing research.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is to some people. My approach though, when I happen to have multiple “work group” to organize, is just to use my OS ability to have multiple windows. No need for any extra bloat, the feature is already there, and it works as I’m used to.

      But apparently, using the tools already available to you is not a common skill these days :(

      • amorpheus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        But apparently, using the tools already available to you is not a common skill these days :(

        So, are you not understanding that other people work differently, or are you just not using that skill?

        Besides offering different approaches for different preferences, there are clear benefits to the extra level of organization. As an additional exercise, try to picture someone using multiple windows and tab groups.

        Not everyone operates on the basic level. Hell, why even have tabs? The OS can manage multiple windows, and you can use multiple desktops to achieve the same result without that bloat.

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          So, are you not understanding that other people work differently, or are you just not using that skill?

          The very first five words of my message was that this was useful to some people.