As opposed to the 24/7 Trump show?

I get your point this though.

What @mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com said, but the adapters arent cheap. You’re going to end up spending more than the 1060 is worth.

A used desktop to slap it in, that you turn on as needed, might make sense? Doubly so if you can find one with an RTX 3060, which would open up 32B models with TabbyAPI instead of ollama. Some configure them to wake on LAN and boot an LLM server.

ChatGPT (last time I tried it) is extremely sycophantic though. Its high default sampling also leads to totally unexpected/random turns.

Google Gemini is now too.

And they log and use your dark thoughts.

I find that less sycophantic LLMs are way more helpful. Hence I bounce between Nemotron 49B and a few 24B-32B finetunes (or task vectors for Gemma) and find them way more helpful.

…I guess what I’m saying is people should turn towards more specialized and “openly thinking” free tools, not something generic, corporate, and purposely overpleasing like ChatGPT or most default instruct tunes.

TBH this is a huge factor.

I don’t use ChatGPT much less use it like it’s a person, but I’m socially isolated at the moment. So I bounce dark internal thoughts off of locally run LLMs.

It’s kinda like looking into a mirror. As long as I know I’m talking to a tool, it’s helpful, sometimes insightful. It’s private. And I sure as shit can’t afford to pay a therapist out of the gazoo for that.

It was one of my previous problems with therapy: payment depending on someone else, at preset times (not when I need it). Many sessions feels like they end when I’m barely scratching the surface. Yes therapy is great in general and for deeper feedback/guidance, but still.

To be clear, I don’t think this is a good solution in general. Tinkering with LLMs is part of my living, I understand the jist of how they work, I tend to use raw completion syntax or even base pretrains.

But most people anthropomorphize them because that’s how chat apps are presented. That’s problematic.

You can still use the IGP, which might be faster in some cases.

Oh actually that’s a great card for LLM serving!

Use the llama.cpp server from source, it has better support for Pascal cards than anything else:

https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/blob/master/docs/multimodal.md

Gemma 3 is a hair too big (like 17-18GB), so I’d start with InternVL 14B Q5K XL: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/InternVL3-14B-Instruct-GGUF

Or Mixtral 24B IQ4_XS for more ‘text’ intelligence than vision: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Mistral-Small-3.2-24B-Instruct-2506-GGUF

I’m a bit ‘behind’ on the vision model scene, so I can look around more if they don’t feel sufficient, or walk you through setting up the llama.cpp server. Basically it provides an endpoint which you can hit with the same API as ChatGPT.

Is this an ADHD meme?

I’m afraid it might be, cause I have a trail of ‘one giant playlists’ and songs on repeat.

1650

You mean GPU? Yeah, it’s good, I was strictly talking about purchasing a laptop for LLM usage, as most are less than ideal for the money. Laptop vram pools are relatively small and SO-DIMMS are usually very slow.

Things will get much better once the “Max” AMD SKUs proliferate.

Yeah, just paying for LLM APIs is dirt cheap, and they (supposedly) don’t scrape data. Again I’d recommend Openrouter and Cerebras! And you get your pick of models to try from them.

Even a framework 16 is not good for LLMs TBH. The Framework desktop is (as it uses a special AMD chip), but it’s very expensive. Honestly the whole hardware market is so screwed up, hence most ‘local LLM enthusiasts’ buy a used RTX 3090 and stick them in desktops or servers, as no one wants to produce something affordable apparently :/

I was a bit mistaken, these are the models you should consider:

https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen3-4B-4bit-DWQ

https://huggingface.co/AnteriorAI/gemma-3-4b-it-qat-q4_0-gguf

https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Jan-nano-GGUF (specifically the UD-Q4 or UD-Q5 file)

they are state-of-the-art at this size, as far as I know.

8GB?

You might be able to run Qwen3 4B: https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen3-4B-4bit-DWQ/tree/main

But honestly you don’t have enough RAM to spare, and even a small model might bog things down. I’d run Open Web UI or LM Studio with a free LLM API, like Gemini Flash, or pay a few bucks for something off openrouter. Or maybe Cerebras API.

…Unfortunely, LLMs are very RAM intensive, and >4GB (more realistically like 2GB) is not going to be a good experience :(

Actually, to go ahead and answer, the “fastest” path would be LM Studio (which supports MLX quants natively and is not time intensive to install), and a DWQ quantization (which is a newer, higher quality variant of MLX models).

Hopefully one of these models, depending on how much RAM you have:

https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen3-14B-4bit-DWQ-053125

https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Magistral-Small-2506-4bit-DWQ

https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/Qwen3-30B-A3B-4bit-DWQ-0508

https://huggingface.co/mlx-community/GLM-4-32B-0414-4bit-DWQ

With a bit more time invested, you could try to set up Open Web UI as an alterantive interface (which has its own built in web search like Gemini): https://openwebui.com/

And then use LM Studio (or some other MLX backend, or even free online API models) as the ‘engine’

Alternatively, especially if you have a small RAM pool, Gemma 12B QAT Q4_0 is quite good, and you can run it with LM Studio or anything else that supports a GGUF. Not sure about 12B-ish thinking models off the top of my head, I’d have to look around.

Honestly perplexity, the online service, is pretty good.

As for local running, one question first: how much RAM does your Mac have? This is basically the factor for what model you can and should run.

I don’t understand.

Ollama is not actually docker, right? It’s running the same llama.cpp engine, it’s just embedded inside the wrapper app, not containerized. It has a docker preset you can use, yeah.

And basically every LLM project ships a docker container. I know for a fact llama.cpp, TabbyAPI, Aphrodite, Lemonade, vllm and sglang do. It’s basically standard. There’s all sorts of wrappers around them too.

You are 100% right about security though, in fact there’s a huge concern with compromised Python packages. This one almost got me: https://pytorch.org/blog/compromised-nightly-dependency/

This is actually a huge advantage for llama.cpp, as it’s free of python and external dependencies by design. This is very unlike ComfyUI which pulls in a gazillian external repos. Theoretically the main llama.cpp git could be compromised, but it’s a single, very well monitored point of failure there, and literally every “outside” architecture and feature is implemented from scratch, making it harder to sneak stuff in.

OK.

Then LM Studio. With Qwen3 30B IQ4_XS, low temperature MinP sampling.

That’s what I’m trying to say though, there is no one click solution, that’s kind of a lie. LLMs work a bajillion times better with just a little personal configuration. They are not magic boxes, they are specialized tools.

Random example: on a Mac? Grab an MLX distillation, it’ll be way faster and better.

Nvidia gaming PC? TabbyAPI with an exl3. Small GPU laptop? ik_llama.cpp APU? Lemonade. Raspberry Pi? That’s important to know!

What do you ask it to do? Set timers? Look at pictures? Cooking recipes? Search the web? Look at documents? Do you need stuff faster or accurate?

This is one reason why ollama is so suboptimal, with the other being just bad defaults (Q4_0 quants, 2048 context, no imatrix or anything outside GGUF, bad sampling last I checked, chat template errors, bugs with certain models, I can go on). A lot of people just try “ollama run” I guess, then assume local LLMs are bad when it doesn’t work right.

Doing some sleuthing, it appears a former follower was mad about some incidents at the shelter, and started a subreddit against it:

The last web archive backup is old, but my guess is the subreddit snowballed (due to the Reddit engagement algo loving hatesubs, of course) and got us here.

So… yeah.

Rest in peace.

Totally depends on your hardware, and what you tend to ask it. What are you running? What do you use it for? Do you prefer speed over accuracy?

TBH you should fold this into localllama? Or open source AI?

I have very mixed (mostly bad) feelings on ollama. In a nutshell, they’re kinda Twitter attention grabbers that give zero credit/contribution to the underlying framework (llama.cpp). And that’s just the tip of the iceberg, they’ve made lots of controversial moves, and it seems like they’re headed for commercial enshittification.

They’re… slimy.

They like to pretend they’re the only way to run local LLMs and blot out any other discussion, which is why I feel kinda bad about a dedicated ollama community.

It’s also a highly suboptimal way for most people to run LLMs, especially if you’re willing to tweak.

I would always recommend Kobold.cpp, tabbyAPI, ik_llama.cpp, Aphrodite, LM Studio, the llama.cpp server, sglang, the AMD lemonade server, any number of backends over them. Literally anything but ollama.

…TL;DR I don’t the the idea of focusing on ollama at the expense of other backends. Running LLMs locally should be the community, not ollama specifically.

Yeah it wasn’t that bad on the guardian’s part, papers have always written headlines that sell. And you absolutely 100% don’t want to inhale plutonium dust. It alpha decays with a lot of energy, which even in small amounts is a recipe for lung cancer. IDK specifics for how much it would take to get kicked up and be deadly.

I didn’t realize the paper was linked! It specifically mentions:

600 Bq / kg

This is a unit of radiation / mass. Going by a WolframAlpha example, one cubic meter of “typical” emits soil about 10,000 Bq. 1 cubic meter of the tested soil emits about > 900,000 Bq, though the high end is an outlier:

So 90x above ambient soil radiation, it seems.

…This is not a lot! Dirt is not very radioactive, we are talking microscopic amounts compared to radiation sources like X-rat machines. You wouldn’t want to inhale a ton of the soil, but still.