• Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    ITT: exactly what the tweet was about. (Edit: It was a tumblr post.)

    Y’all just saw “AI” and started frothing at the mouth about LLMs when, in the context of the tweet, it might just as well have referred to path finding AI in a video game.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      But tbf ‘AI’ in current public discourse and pop culture is (annoyingly) used synonymously with ‘LLM’ more often than not

    • oppy1984@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously, I don’t get the issue but I understand the phenomenon. It’s like painters when the camera was invented,

      “cameras will put us out of work, cameras are lower quality, anyone with a camera can just take a picture!”

      Painters are still around, painted art is still desired and expensive. It will be the same over time with AI, we just have to wait for people to get over it.

        • oppy1984@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          As always, there’s an xkcd for that…lol

          To quickly further expand on my previous example with a few I thought of afterwards,

          • the wax cylinder will kill live music
          • the radio will kill live music
          • the TV will kill radio
          • the airplane will kill the cruise lines
          • Sheldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Are cruise lines as a mode of transportation still around? Cruise ships are for leisure now, but they were previously much more prevalent.

            • oppy1984@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I was just pointing out that they still exist, basically they adapted and remained in business.

              • Sheldan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                Idk how comparable it is, the success they had faded, the popularity decreased heavily.I wouldn’t call just survival a good outcome.

                I don’t think many people considered taking a cruise ship for a regular passage in which the Mode of transportation wasnt a big part of the attraction (unless they are scared of flying, I guess)

                There are still airships around, but they are a rare thing.

                • oppy1984@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  They changed their business model from a mode of transport to a mode of vacation. The profits for major cruise lines are in the billions so really it’s more than surviving.

                  Industry adapts or changes, buggy makers become car companies, radio stations started also broadcasting TV signals, cable companies started offering Internet, and cruise lines started offering vacations rather than transportation.

                  As for airships, they were set back by The Hindenburg and USS Akron & Macon crashing. But they are starting to make a comeback, most are just focusing on cargo ships at the moment. It’ll take time since The Hindenburg is burned into everyone’s brain, but as people get used to seeing cargo blimps and larger cargo airships flying around and not crashing, they may just come to accept it and treat it like a mini cruise ship. Spend a few days flying over scenic spots and relaxing then disembark.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Aren’t you OP? Also, people currently understand “AI” (a marketing term) as “LLMs” and audiovisual producing software. Had you mentioned it in the late 90s, it would’ve been more about “The Matrix” kind of sci-fi AI, for instance, and before it would’ve referred to Cameron’s Terminators or Herbert’s “machine intelligence”. Words and their context. You’re being purposefully obtuse because people here wrote thoughtful comments disagreeing with the premise in the image you posted (and apparently agree with) and you don’t like it as it makes you feel silly. That’s all.