qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agoWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldimagemessage-square199fedilinkarrow-up1953arrow-down133
arrow-up1920arrow-down1imageWe don't talk about IPv5lemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square199fedilink
minus-squareStarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·30 days agoIt has less eyes on it due to it being less popular. It also introduces an extra vector of attack.
minus-squareAuli@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·29 days agoIt does not have less eyes on and it’s 50% of Google traffic.
minus-squarejj4211@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·28 days agoThink they mean local networks. If an IT department carefully curates IPv4 but ignores IPv6, then a rogue actor can set up a parallel IPv6 network largely without being noticed. IPv6 can be managed, just that it is a blindside for a lot of these departments.
It has less eyes on it due to it being less popular. It also introduces an extra vector of attack.
It does not have less eyes on and it’s 50% of Google traffic.
Think they mean local networks.
If an IT department carefully curates IPv4 but ignores IPv6, then a rogue actor can set up a parallel IPv6 network largely without being noticed.
IPv6 can be managed, just that it is a blindside for a lot of these departments.