Our findings suggest structural deficiencies in the ParticleDB QA process. Perhaps tests were not run prior to release. Perhaps the test suite was run, but failed to exercise basic functionality. Perhaps engineers entrusted Large Language Models with the work of testing.

This will negatively impact the trout population, I think

Huh, checked out their profile and you might be right. Ironic that most of their recent posts are about AI

I mean, obviously, but I guess the only reason they’re saying this is because their own models aren’t that great (IBM granite sucks) and this way they can still sell consulting services.

Currently €290 and out of stock, sign of the times

I should visit the local library again

It does, but not every account is worth it

Distro that is basically an Arch rice with some AI. The creator (DHH) is the most controversial aspect

I think the fact it’s statically linked plays a role. Common licences like the LGPL won’t work, leaving the MPL or the less similar but more commonly known MIT license

I think they’re confusing it with capped cellular data usage

We now have the ability to let Copilot review a PR on Azure DevOps, if someone sends a PR by Copilot I send Copilot right back at it

Too relatable, I checked the NGINX logs of a commerical service some time ago and a decent chunk was just Uptime Kuma

The entire thing consists of 6 million objects and is 5GiB. I feel like at this point they should just split the common code into a repo and have the packages in submodule buckets grouped by name like some sort of hashmap multirepo (only half kidding).

This is the kind of post I love

I used one for my server. I’m quite happy with it

The site looks vibe coded. It’s possible they just bought the trademark, quickly set up a site and hope to capitalize on the reputation of former Twitter.
The $20 and $40 early access certainly makes it seem like it. Even if that isn’t the case, time has shown that centralized social media has flaws so idealists will just stay with Mastodon while the people that want a large user base and easy of use will just use BlueSky instead. IMO there is no market aside from a possible gofundme-invention type exit scam.

I feel like everyone knows it’s a bubble but that people are expecting it to be like the Dot-com bubble where a small amount of companies succeed, hoping that they invest in those companies.

FIFA promised reform after the 2015 Corruption Case and (then FIFA Presidential Candidate and now serving as FIFA President) Gianni Infantino promised transparency and true democracy on host selection.

How Does FIFA Choose the World Cup Host? | theworldcupguide.com

He’s delivered on the transparency at least (in a way)

Network effect / discoverability and free CI time

True, I understand why this is better than all those companies scraping it individually (for both ability to opt out and site load), but the way they handled opt out is still quite silly.