• potoo22@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    We have a deployed branch. It doesn’t get merged into master until it gets reviewed… the technical debt got too big so it never gets reviewed and we just keep branching off deployed

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, when you said “we have a deployed branch”, you could just have stopped there. All the rest is just what happens after you decide to rename your master branch.

    • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      We build off develop and only update master once a year or so. Our company also pays 4 V&V engineers, compared to 9 software devs.

      After a release cycle, we update master. Master has never, never been built by itself.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Depends on the field you’re in. At my previous company to release a new system for internal use only I had to go through 19 validations(each one 50-100 pages of manual tests). None of it had real source control except uploading final zip of files(no source code, just the enable files).

        I wrote all the files, wrote all the test cases, wrote all the documentation, executed everything and wrote most of the reports. They just fired me last week so hope they have fun when they need to update something…