[dude with glasses in a communist t-shirt, arguing] I’m the only leftist here, your opinions are TRASH

[dude holding a theory book on smug, arguing] Read theory you losers, you’re all WRONG

[dude in an anarchist hoodie, arguing] Nuh-uh, I’m the only leftist here, you’re SHITLIBS

[the three dudes are now caught in a cartoon fight, glasses gone flying, punches everywhere, while a firing squad of nazis are targeting them with rifles]

[a confused nazi asks] Why… why are they still arguing?

https://thebad.website/comic/infighting

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2日前

    I’ve talked to a handful of people that lived through that era in Russia and none of them had positive things to say. They were all working class folks. I trust their judgment over someone on the internet, and I don’t get sucked into team sports identity type shit. We can pick and choose the good ideas and acknowledge the shitty ones.

    • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2日前

      That’s my point. USSR and the CCP have arguably permanently damaged the communism “brand”.

      And you talked to russians, things were even worse for nations occupied by the russians.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2日前

        It took centuries before any liberal or democratic project managed to produce a society that wasn’t far more brutal than the USSR. Yet you don’t see people going around saying “the French Revolution permanently damaged the Democratic brand!”

        • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1日前

          Because the French Revolution didnt permanently damage democracy as a political system. And democratic system in one form or another existed for millennia before the French Revolution.

          The USSR and China under the CCP permanently discredited (without any chance of rehabilitation) communism as legitimate ideology.

          No one in their right mind would want anything to do with communism. It’s like asking for genocide, mass killings, gulags, lack of free expression and poverty. No one is going to do that.

          And I not saying this in the polemical sense used by pro-crime/pro-corruption Americans (“this is such a socialist shirhole”).

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1日前

            Because the French Revolution didnt permanently damage democracy as a political system.

            Ok. Neither did the communist revolutions of the 20th century permanently damage communism as a political system.

            And democratic system in one form or another existed for millennia before the French Revolution.

            As have anarchist and communistic systems.

            The USSR and China under the CCP permanently discredited (without any chance of rehabilitation) communism as legitimate ideology.

            No. They didn’t. Only too western liberals who were always hostile to communism would say that. The idea that communism is permanently dead just because capitalists didn’t like it is pure “end of history” Neo-liberalist nonsense, and basically ignores the fact that a large chunk of the worlds population still actively feels positively about these revolutionary projects; to say nothing of the people who don’t like those particular ones, but still agree with communism in general.

            Besides, so called “liberal democracies” have done far more evil than the USSR or Communist China. In fact, they’re doing a repeat of the Holocaust as we speak. Does that “permanently (without any chance of rehabilitation) discredit democracy as a legitimate ideology”?

            No one in their right mind would want anything to do with communism. It’s like asking for genocide, mass killings, gulags, lack of free expression and poverty. No one is going to do that.

            Sure, if you’re a complete dullard who has mainlined nothing but pure, concentrated cold war propaganda without any thought or consideration, without ever bothering to open a single book on political theory. Everyone else is not that stupid.

            And guess what? You have genocide, mass killings, gulags, lack of free expression, and poverty now, no communism needed. In fact, communism has almost always been associated with a reduction in those things if you actually check the stats.

            And I not saying this in the polemical sense used by pro-crime/pro-corruption Americans

            Yes, you are. That is exactly how you are saying it.

            • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1日前

              So if there one thing I’d be happy for you take out of this convo, is that I am in no way supportive of US-style polemics about “this is such a communist shithole!” or any of the variety of standardized phrases comparing “capitalism” to “communism”.

              When I lived in the US, this was extremely annoying! That being said, that doesn’t mean I am going to deny reality.

              Ok. Neither did the communist revolutions of the 20th century permanently damage communism as a political system.

              But they have. There are no more communist countries. The remaining countries that are marketed as communist, have long become authoritarian capitalist countries.

              There is zero mass momentum towards “communist” parties. Many “communist” parties are little more than fronts for places like russia (a hyper-capitalist shithole with a majority of the population committed to genocidal imperialism).

              Anarchists and communistic system have indeed existed before the USSR/CCP China appeared, but they are not functionally comparable to an ideology-focused communist government regime.

              It’s like saying commerce, competition, innovation are element of capitalism, when these things have existed before capitalism and will likely exist after capitalism (in the polemical sense) becomes mostly a matter of history books.

              Besides, so called “liberal democracies” have done far more evil than the USSR or Communist China. In fact, they’re doing a repeat of the Holocaust as we speak. Does that “permanently (without any chance of rehabilitation) discredit democracy as a legitimate ideology”?

              This is false.

              Sure, if you’re a complete dullard who has mainlined nothing but pure, concentrated cold war propaganda without any thought or consideration, without ever bothering to open a single book on political theory. Everyone else is not that stupid.

              This is not cold war propaganda. I was born in the USSR, as was my family. I live in a country that was occupied under the banner of communism under the USSR.

              I oppose the current oligarch regime and I have an extremely negative view of the American political system. That being said, communism is not the answer.

              Communism is the past. It’s history. It’s done.

              We need to build something better (often inspired by the ideals of Marx), we are wasting chasing a dead end ideology; this only makes the oligarchs and the criminals stronger.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18時間前

                This is false.

                Well, I don’t see any point trying to continue to have a discussion with someone who’s just a blunt genocide denier.

                Suffice to say, to all your arguments: This is false.

            • 0x0@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1日前

              Ok. Neither did the communist revolutions of the 20th century permanently damage communism as a political system.

              Watch the news, talk to people, “communism bad” is all they blurt out without thinking.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18時間前

                What? Most people seem pretty positive towards Communism.

                Ohhhh wait, you think only white westerners are “people”

      • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2日前

        Trying to decouple the term and core ideas from the past actions is going to be an uphill battle forever. That requires imagination and forward thinking, but you have the folks dunking on it because of the atrocities carried out under it, and the folks on the other side that have managed to embrace those parts so hard that they can no longer sea reason or find nuance.

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2日前

          Yes it is exactly like how antichrists have co-opted the term Christian. For many if it ever was, it will never be clean again in their lifetime unless there’s some massive Purge. They never were Christians and, will never be christians. But as long as they’re allowed to be the face of Christianity it’s only going to hurt it as a whole. At least more than it already hurts itself.

        • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2日前

          Yes, we need a “brand” that builds upon the ideals (and some of the theory) of communism/Marxism while taking in account both history (e.g. even something as simple as democratic governance being non-negotiable) and the “spirit” and challenges of our times.

      • Bubbey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2日前

        Under capitalism you can criticize capitalism. under communism, dissension is met with punishment.

        • J-Bone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2日前

          If not death, or being institutionalised.

          But you can also get institutionalised or killed under capitalism too if you say the wrong things (China, Russia, the Gulf States).

          While you might not be killed in the US, but you can be harassed via lawsuits or deported to a foreign internment camp if you say the wrong things.