• YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    YouTube is not really ‘social media’ unless by that one means ‘audiovisual media created by non-corporate entities, fellow members of society’. I guess it can be if all you watch is GRWM and ‘daily updates’ videos…

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In a society that uses terms such as “fake news” and “peaceful war”, I’m not surprised words have lost meaning in all areas, lol.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          “If you can comment on it, it’s social media.”

          I can comment on how stupid that is, but that doesn’t make it social media. The term was invented to describe the likes of Facebook, and it’s predecessors and … Postdecessors. Antecedents? No that’s the same. Successors. There we go. Had to work that out.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      24 hours ago

      There are plenty of smaller content creators that are interactive with the comment section. Then there is also just the comment section like we’re doing right now. There are also live streams that get interactive as well. It’s absolutely a social media platform.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Discussion boards existed way before what people consider ‘social media’ (MySpace, Facebook, and the list goes on), places where people talk not about a topic at hand but themselves. If you consider ALL OF IT social media then I guess I agree, sure. And live streams about themselves and not, like, an open discussion about a given topic is certainly what one would consider ‘social media’, but like I said it’s all about what you do with the platform.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Because we didn’t have the concept of “social media” before those sites. Or at least they weren’t popular enough to get a new category dedicated to them.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Those were pretty much social sites using text with a tiny bit of media (occasional images).

          Social media has a big emphasis on the media part, with video clips and images and so on for starting most of the discussions. Twitter started off mostly text and kind of became social media based on the screenshot I have seen of it.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            And I think social media revolved heavily around people sharing the mundanity of their everyday life with the world, and in my experience, that was very rarely the point of message boards or forums.