The freedom of religion to continue enabling child rapists.
Perhaps all religion should die along with the cunts in charge.
What FREEDOM exactly is it violating?
On a scale of 1 to 10, I wonder how old that judge’s last sexual
partnervictim wasThis tracks with the US electing a pedophile.
Even more evidence that it is far safer to leave your kids with a drag queen (or king) than the clergy.
Freedom absolutism is great!
You can’t take away my freedom to rape kids!
Let’s get this straight.
Psychiatrist are required to break doctor patient confidentiality if patient is a threat, right and report it.
Lawyers must report crimes to law enforcement, breaking confidentiality too.
But priests are ‘sprcial’ in the magic, secret telling closets?
Religion, ALL religion, is a fucking cancer, the blight of humanity.
This is a tragically close-minded opinion. You sound hurt and angry. I hope you get well.
It’s an opinion born of history. I hope you learn some history at some point.
Notice that I didn’t say faith is a cancer. Faith is one thing, religion is a whole other beast. Religion exists for one purpose, the same purpose it has always existed for. Control of the masses. That’s it.
You’re backpedaling because you know you’re wrong.
Bye!
Name one that isn’t. Don’t worry, I’ll wait.
You’re welcome for the lesson, by the way. Next one is on you, though.
Jainism is so great, because the induct children into the religion as monks, as a form of slavery…
So, back to finding an example, I guess?
They’re also really keen on starving people to death, too… If they think it happens to be a terminal illness.
So, you were saying?
republicans have proven time and time again that they love children…in absolute most inappropriate way.
We wont be free of groomers until we lock up every single pastor, priest, and every other Christian clergy in this country.
The freedom of religion to do what?
The freedom to not report cases of child abuse when told in the Catholic confessional.
To fuck kids, dude.
Read the article. Your question is answered in there.
To protect child rapists.
It’s just one of the most outrageous stuff “freedom of religion” is being used for. Liberal democracies all around the world are being dismantled in the name of “freedom of religion” in part, other part in name of money.
Wow! But if I “overheard” part of this “confession” as a “mandated reporter” BY FED LAW (confessionals are NOT SOUND PROOF), I can go to jail if I do not report what I overheard and the government found out I knew… straight to court!
Yet, these fucks get a hall pass to keep fucking with kids “because of religion”, religion doesn’t give you the freedom to fuck with kids but the Catholics would know the most about fucking with kids wouldn’t they?!?! Appalling! Our nation is fucked!
I mean, am I surprised when our “president” is a know pedophile who talked about his own daughter sexually and was besties with Epstein!? WHERE IS THE CLIENT LIST!? We know Drumpf was probs the invite NUMBER 1 and FUNDED it! 🤦🏽♀️🤷🏽♀️
I’m not a legal professional (merely an ill-informed amateur), and especially not an American one, but it seems to me like the judge’s order makes a pretty convincing argument that the injunction is legally warranted.
Maybe we might consider that federal law might be the problem before we rush to accuse the judge personally of being a nonce?
The fact they would protect abusers just to comply with their faith speaks volumes about their priorities. I mean it’s no surprise when they already protect the predators within their ranks, so why not do the same with their followers?
Standing up for religious freedom…to keep child abuse secret.
