When you have A joint party with a 2 and a 20 something year old you can break out the regex:

27?

Both

Billiam Bakesale

An ape could though.

What’s the worst that can happen? Someone buys it and starts hawking boner pills? Yeah, that ain’t exactly gonna ruin his good name.

Eh, congrats! New Job?

When was the last time you got a 63% raise?

🏴‍☠️

Yeah with the actual work that’s happening it’s almost as if the state is paying people to do a job.

Corrections and Clarifications

An earlier version of this article misstated the amount of money spent by the state of California on each violent sex predator.

That $1.7M is the total divided by the individual, BTW. That really isn’t an outrageous cost over the time frame though.

In an ironic twist of complete capitalist predictability, the game we know today was also stolen from the original developer.

This whole thing just makes me want to steer clear of wordpress entirely.

I pulled up to a crossroad, stopped at the stop sign, and waited for the 2 vehicles on the main road to pass. Another car pulled up across from me and came to a complete stop at their stop sign, they waited for a moment, then started to go. They looked again, saw the other vehicles coming, stopped (not yet in the main road), then started to proceed again. They stopped again (this time in the main road). They started to go again and got hit by the first vehicle on the main road. The next vehicle on the main road was an ambulance who saw the whole thing and stopped.

Honestly not sure why you would stop at a sign, see traffic coming then go and stop multiple times if you weren’t on something or trying for some fraud.

Banning Bump stocks and legalizing hemp.

Many Christians believe that living together before marriage is wrong. Many conservatives are either Christian or appeal to Christian values (as they’re both largely patriarchal and controlling; at least as practiced). This guy’s conservative.

State communication should not travel over private channels that can arbitrarily limit access to that State’s communications.

It gives a false sense of security to beginner programmers and doesn’t offer a more tailored solution that a more practiced programmer might create. This can lead to a reduction in code quality and can introduce bugs and security holes over time. If you don’t know the syntax of a language how do you know it didn’t offer you something dangerous? I have copilot at work and the only thing I actually accept its suggestions for now are writing log statements and populating argument lists. While those both still require review they are generally faster than me typing them out. Most of the rest of what it gives me is undesired: it’s either too verbose, too hard to read, or just does something else entirely.

Do we actually know if he had a knife? Initial reporting was that the police knew he had a knife because he refused to take his hands out of his pockets. While he did threaten them, it was contingent upon them continuing to follow them. He did not actually attack them until after multiple officers attempted to tase him. Furthermore, so what if he had a knife? As far as we’re aware, he’s got a second amendment right to keep and bear arms. Being armed isn’t an excuse to be killed by cops because you are generally explicitly allowed to be armed.

All in all:

• We don’t know he’s armed
• We don’t know his intentions
• He didn’t immediately attack anyone
• While he did threaten them he made no indication that he intended to follow through until he was attacked
• He continued to try to leave the situation until he was attacked
• The police attacked him first
• He didn’t have a gun
• 4 people were shot by the police; he was killed (this seems to have been erroneously reported earlier. He is now reportedly in critical condition), an officer and 2 bystanders were wounded
• No one was stabbed

While that is textbook escalation, it really doesn’t seem like they shot him cause he had a knife. They shot him (and 3 others) cause he didn’t care about their authority and they couldn’t let the guy that was already on the train go. And all that came about because he tried to skip a fare that costs around the same amount as the bullets fired.

There are 5 basic rules for guns:

• Treat every gun as if it were loaded.
• Always point your gun in a safe direction.
• Never point your gun at anything you don’t intend to shoot.
• Keep your finger off the trigger until you’re ready to shoot.
• Be sure of your target and what’s beyond.

What I posted was a subset of the five then alluded to the full list.

It’s way more than just trigger discipline. There’s the traditional rules of course:

• Never point your gun at something you do not intend to kill
• Be sure of your target and what’s beyond
• Trigger discipline

But there’s also reasonable shit beyond the 5 basic rules:

• Don’t willingly put yourself in a situation where use of a gun may be warranted.
• Property isn’t worth killing over, especially in situations where you had to go out of your way to put yourself in perceived danger to protect it.
• Don’t block in the person you are trying to convince to leave.
• People with guns commit more acts of violence than those who don’t. Owning a gun is an irresponsible choice. There are more and there are less responsible gun owners, but owning a gun puts you and those around at a greater risk of violence. When all you have is a hammer …