Had someone defending them the other day on a post about the dog shooting.

They’re all bastards. They know what they’re choosing. Funny how those with good intention tend to leave early in their career.

It’s a shame because society does need decent policing services. They are needed to maintain order.

I see the true American coming out in him.

They will steal everyone’s retirement funds in that country, then they will come for whoever else’s they can get. They’re thieves.

That one I didn’t miss, I left it out. I can’t argue with it.

I see plenty of objections, many from people who probably know much more about AI and US law than myself, but if what I interpret is accurate I’m trying to find flaw with it, given what’s confronting us with AI and its management.

I don’t see anywhere where the US government would be buying or bailing anything out, at least not upfront anyway. There’s no doubt to me these companies have stolen much, so they owe the public back for that. There’s no doubt to me those that run these systems aren’t working in the US public’s interest, so the question of whether regulating or offering public protections should happen isn’t hard for me. That of course implies good governance, not what currently exists, which is a problem.

As I said I might be missing a lot, not being American or an AI user, but yeah aside from who is in charge currently I only see benefit here.

Yeah that’s what I read here, acquisition not share purchase.

As someone who has never used AI, another thing that springs to mind; the possibility that under good governance and regulation, AI services might become more trusted and perform better.

I’m trying to find flaw with this proposal, given what’s in front of us with AI, as someone who doesn’t know a lot about using it but sees everyday the problems bad regulation and intention causes with it.

a large pile of gold

That depends as well. Gold in specimen and nugget form can be worth considerably more than its value by weight and there’s plenty out there chasing these. These are not hard to move at all.

But yeah, there can be difficulties trading it and it’s generally subject to taxes. Quite often you need to be licenced as at least a fossicker if you’re selling unrefined gold as a prospector.

That’s without the pain in the arse process of separating it from impurities.

Well, TIL, cheers

14 eyes

Never heard of that. There is Five Eyes (US, UK, Aus, NZ, Canada)

Yeah same here. The results are still good though

Edit: and no I haven’t tried that

Which reminds me, I need to get back to that. I still have some more stuff to move over.

I’ll still keep it for maps and earth when necessary. I wish there were professional grade replacements for Earth but there isn’t unfortunately.

Yeah good point and I agree with it.

Most blokes couldn’t give a shit. Women on the other hand will effectively have it used against them because they will be judged badly by the same man who’d laugh with a bloke on it.

Edit: fixed some garble

Release away. I have nothing to be embarrassed about there

Yep, the one really in the club didn’t just survive, she’s well looked after.

That said, they’d do away with her too if it became necessary.

Well they are afraid somewhat, otherwise they wouldn’t be threatening us with this and carrying it out.

They’ve made their bed, it doesn’t have to be this way. It ends badly for them which ever way they go.

Precisely. We mightn’t be the ones but in the end they’ll get beaten.

Cool, then we’ll just openly fight you my dude

I’ve never…

I have a few times, with no record other than speeding fines. So havecquitexa few others I know in the same category.

Can you point me

Yes, take a look at them beating the shit out of protestors against a genocidal state or sports ground construction.

Like the rest here, I’ll take that as a threat

Thanks so much

You’re welcome.

Such a rebel

Not really, just observing what’s becoming common abuse in the interest of bad actors.

black and white

Well, this is, pretty much. Yeah, I’m aware there are different situations, though it’s funny how a good deal of them end up in abuse. The second sentence is about your attempt to dress my view, which is commonly shared for good reason, as faux moral outrage when it seems to be a fact. There’s more bad in there than good, demonstrably. It isn’t faux moral outrage anywhere, it’s a simple fact.

Every time they pull you over and ask you if you’ve been ‘in trouble with the police before’, it’s an indication of their desire to intimidate and bully.

Here’s the point though; many of these people make the decision on this career for the simple reason they are narcissistic bullies who want a career that protects their actions. Quite a few who join it for the good reasons leave the service.

For you then, I’ll go with all cops are bastards, if that makes you happy. I’m not sure where you get sexual gratification from in my comment, perhaps you’ve overdone trying to be polite in criticism or something.

It might be a largely thankless job, however it seems to attract a lot of our shittiest people, who choose to do it. We see that with how they attack protestors and how they beat the shit out of indigenous and LGBT people.

That’s what I’ll base my view on. Fuck your faux moral outrage.