To be clear, they were written from the perspective of a gay man, with their interactions modelled after his experiences, but they are not canonically “gay” (they have no sexual orientation).
To be clear, they were written from the perspective of a gay man, with their interactions modelled after his experiences, but they are not canonically “gay” (they have no sexual orientation).
Good luck even finding something not in nixpkgs though
One of my favorite apps actually wasn’t in nixpkgs (don’t worry, I fixed that). But I was pretty surprised to learn that it wasn’t there.
I’d say what it is, but I’d be doxxing myself.
But the claim is that you need to learn nix to install apps that aren’t in the nix repos, which isn’t true.
You can. And then you can even contribute that back upstream and make it available in the repos, but that’s not a requirement if what you need to to get an app to run on your system that isn’t currently packaged for it.
Oh yeah, they’re all over Lemmy.
They will cheer on revolution, but not a single one of them would ever dream of making the first move.
Their whole deal is picking up pet causes and then making snarky remarks from the sidelines.
You need to learn a whole programming language to install an AppImage or Flatpak?
Lol its so cute that that’s what you think you’re doing 😂
Misusing them in what weigh? Like using an uncorrect word? Or using a word that has a different consternation than the one they meant to use?
So we’re clear, your position that all AI is inherently evil and useless is absurd.
It’s made all the moreso by the fact that you’re clearly just parroting talking points you don’t actually understand.
How many resources does it use?
Don’t use services that track all your activity down. It should be pretty obvious as to why.
This doesn’t really apply here.
Unironically celebrating your disdain for nuance! 🥰
This is Lemmy, all AI is evil and useless.
That’s nice. Just exposing your dishonesty. Move along.
I’ll say this.
When I weigh the choice of handing over my personal videos to a company that is explicitly and actively going to use them to:
Or
Putting a NAS at a friends house, or paying a couple bucks a month for some block storage.
I end up preferring the second set of options. It’s fine if you don’t, but don’t pretend you have no idea that your personal videos and information are valuable to Google.
Preventing corporate entities from presenting falsehoods as facts is not a meaningful infringement on free speech.
If it is, then it’s clear that truly free, totally unrestricted in any way speech isn’t a good idea.
Sounds more like we need to more heavily regulate sources of misinformation, rather than deeming some people too stupid to participate in the system.
Bitcoin?