I touch grass every day. I want to do it on my own terms, not Amazon’s.

I grew up calling it “sticky tape.” Because we also had tape measures, various forms of magnetic tapes and plumbing tape.

Everything on the system, including the desktop, kernel, and CUPS, can be installed by snap.

Turns out hosting a bunch of files is very cheap.

I love Lemmy.

I was wondering whether I was going to have to explain that rule to a crowd of angry zealots, furious that I could possibly oppose the Great and Mighty Apple like that.

I’m not opposed to having macs in my collection (though as it so happens right now I don’t have any), because it’s not about hating Apple and entirely about whether I can do something useful with the hardware.

A majority of the ARM hardware I have is old Android phones booting a pretty standard Linux distro with custom kernels. Most of them have drivers missing for various pieces of hardware, but as long as they can boot, connect to my homelab network over USB and run containers, they make excellent build/test devices.

Yeah this is basically what I do. People like giving me their stuff because I’m transparent about the deal:

1. If at all possible, I will wipe it for you.
2. If it’s usable, I will either add it to my TrashCloud™ or (especially for laptops) set it up for a kid.
3. Parts/devices that I cannot get working I will take to electronics recycling.
4. No iPhones/iPads.

Another win for Linux!

My response isn’t “abandon law” either.

Newsmax? They’ve gone too far for Newsmax?

Wow.

I don’t answer irrelevant questions from harassers. Stop harassing me.

Stop harassing me.

I think it’s pretty clear that many in power don’t believe the constitution applies to them. That’s not doomerism, because my answer isn’t “therefore we must give up.”

Cool, so go ahead and use one and stop harassing me.

Lol ok really are desperate aren’t you? Unfortunately, pathetic berating isn’t going to make me do your research for you. Search engines exist. You can use one to answer your own question at any time.

You seem like you’re desperate to find this out because someone else asked you and you don’t know how to use DuckDuckGo. Otherwise you wouldn’t be insistent on bringing up that irrelevant question.

I’m glad we’ve established that we both agree that ICE agents deserve due process. It took far longer than I expected to get agreement on that simple topic out of you.

Wait… Are you repeatedly asking me this because you don’t know and are desperate to find out? You do know that search engines exist to help you with this, right? You don’t have to pathetically beg some stranger to do your research for you.

I asked a simple yes or no question. Do you believe ICE agents deserve due process?

Refusing to answer your irrelevant questions doesn’t make me ignorant of the topic.

Do you think ICE agents deserve due process? Why or why not?

You can’t even show that you’re competent enough to show why your question is relevant, and yet you expect me to prove myself? Try again dude.

And I’ve already answered what I think should be done with ICE agents. My answer of “due process” was that sent you off into this irrelevant discussion in the first place.

Cool, so you do understand that immigration law isn’t the right framework for determining what to do with ICE agents. Why do you keep asking irrelevant questions then?

ICE aren’t illegal immigrants

Great, thanks for establishing that we both agree that (at least as far as we’re aware) ICE isn’t made up of undocumented immigrants. Therefore the topic of what to do with undocumented immigrants is irrelevant to this conversation.

Now we can get back to the meat of the issue: what to do with ICE agents.