Do these posts really need the alt text?
Do these posts really need the alt text?
In Seattle we did this years ago. In practice, people just treat the new “reusable” bags as disposable. This law is a stop gap and ultimately kicks the can down thr road to placate business interests and the bullshit plastic lobby.
Bring on the downvotes, folks, but the reality is that now people will be throwing away thicker plastic.
Cool. Go home. We up to our eyeballs with outsiders. Don’t forget to buy a keychain.
It’s for keys.
Edit: guys, this is /c/shitpost. I was messing around in the spirit of the community.
I’d say the same for Tiktok users. But that’s the popular platform, so it’s unpopular to criticize it.
Because the market share is so big, everyone can use it, and everybody wants a fucking participation prize.
There’s nothing scientific about refuting math. If the math bears out the truth, then it’s scientific. Why do people not get that this?
Either I’m misunderstanding your intent or you’re saying that “deep” math and science are unrelated or potentially separate.
I’m going to say it again: I hate this time line.
“Still fantastic,” seems to imply that actual science is potentially less important on a science program and hosted on YouTube than some implied pseudo-science about a fantasy video game.
I hate our time line.
I thought I read it in an Oscar Wilde book.
Just by reordering the words to “shoots activist dead.” Done. Copy editor job unlocked.
And that’s funny why?
I don’t know, but some ignorant people who don’t know biology are. (not talking about OP).
Why is this funny? Like at all.
It’ll drop from “iron clad support” to “iron plated support” for Israel.
Shaking the veggie tree again? COME AT ME BRUTHOR!
Downvoting for the use of an uncommon word.
This is so tone deaf and privileged. Fuck this woman and this article.
I didn’t say they did. I was speaking with exposition, not specificity. It was a nuanced and more broad discussion on the topic of bias in general.
Why is reading comprehension so hard for you? I wrote clearly.
This is a form of bias on their part. They think or say it’s being balanced, but the lack of full factual disclosure is a choice. Bias can show up in other ways, too.
The length of a segment, for example. How long a topic is covered shows bias through emphasis or lack of emphasis.
Omission of details, over-covering points of view while ignoring others, when a story is covered, who covers the story, etc., may all seem unimportant, but they are choices.
Bias isn’t necessarily bad if it’s factual. To your point, someone should be stating who this individual was - even just generally - and state something along the lines of what you’re saying to refute the “mentally ill” allegations.
Cool.
Post it across as many parallel subs on the fediverse as possible. Nobody will notice. It’s not like they’re connected or will stack them together based on when you post them or anything.