• 2 Posts
  • 55 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2026

help-circle


  • Hyperphantasia. I had to look that up. While it is pretty descriptive of my inner world, I don’t think I would ever self-identify as that. Feels… a little much.

    I find the whole concept of cognitive styles fascinating and I think there is a trade off. While the advent of reading is certainly a great thing, I think for many it has shrunk a part of the brain that processes speech. Prior to books, if you needed to know something you had better listen close, comprehend it quickly, and be damned sure you remembered it because there may not be a second chance.


  • That’s wild, I am the complete opposite.

    When I read my mind takes what I am reading and provides a rich imaginatory backdrop replete with emotional undertones that unfolds and plays out as the words become concepts and the concepts link together in context to the plot/scenario/etc. It’s like a combination of a movie and playing make-believe in real time. It doesn’t seem to require any particular effort, it just happens automatically.

    Except with math heavy subjects, I can usually get the gist of any topic by reading about it.

    Conversely, I can barely follow audio instructions or explanations at all. Having something explained by a friend is fine, lots of back and forth until it clicks. Casual listening, like a fiction book, is fine.

    Anything else and I get a little lost halfway through, usually trying to remember the first thing that was said.

    Being at work is torture because I’m nodding along with the boss but I usually don’t know what the heck he’s talking about if he’s trying to explain something complex. Just let me read the documentation, bro.


  • She was extremely entertainment savvy. She had a 6th sense in knowing how and when to grab the spotlight, how to cause an uproar, and ride it until it died down. Then it was on to the next transformation.

    Even if you didn’t like her, she made sure you were paying attention to her.

    I was more of a heavy metal, alt and industrial fan, but I give credit where it’s due. She played the game masterfully.










  • MrOtingocni@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldWhen y'all gonna learn
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    No, I won’t.

    Fuck your “reason”, people covet their own logical prowess but in reality they didn’t come to their views on their own nor their way of seeing things on their own. In fact, it’s a weakness borrowed from others, based on flawed methodology and is what got you into the situation you’re in now.

    I ain’t teaching a class, believe me or don’t, I dgaf.

    99% of people are mostly interested in confirming their own myopic view, to the degree that they will commit violence to ensure it. If someone reaches out a hand, I will grab it, but that’s exceedingly rare and it’s not my day job to fish randos out of their own ignorance un-asked.



  • I don’t know shit about mathematics, except that when numbers and letters collude, that’s a fucking conspiracy against me. That said, I strongly suspect that for legit mathematicians, solving thorny math problems is only half of what they do, but rather, by operating from a platform of experience, intuit the nature of numerical systems, what that means in relation to other systems, and how we use them to understand and navigate the world.

    The title sounds as ridiculous as proclaiming professors of literature are worried because an LLM can parse a sentence.

    There’s a fundamental knowledge, both in the specifics of systems and holistically that can only be gained by solving these quandaries through the lens of human interpretation.