This doesn’t help. It’s victim blaming. The marching is the effort. People only have access to what they see and what they hear. If there are no marches, then what most people only see and hear is a curated narrative by the billionaires. The marches show others they aren’t alone. If you truly want a progressive uprising, stop being a dick, and encourage those who are trying to win back our country from fascists.

The steam is already being used to create the electricity… Leave that shit to engineers.

If you are into people vomiting on you, go right ahead.

No he won’t. I’m not saying he doesn’t deserve it, but I’m being realistic.

Play Armored core 6 if you haven’t.

Not arguing with you, but you misunderstand the point of the post. A guy that would get so mad that he would refuse to use a ticket he already has purchased (which is almost certainly a fictional scenario) because he can’t see the crotch of the protagonist is a creep… The reference to porn in the response hammers the point home because it is a movie that you can watch that will definitely contain visible crotches. It’s not commentary on the presence of sex in movies or that it should be limited to pornography, but a specific comment about that one person who seems to be taking a moral stand over not being able to see more of the protagonist’s crotch. You keep trying to say the post is a broader comment on sex in movies. That assumption is not supported by the post. I only responded because you seem well intentioned, but are maybe drawing upon a personal event that is not applicable to the post itself.

The point of the post and the reason for calling the guy a creep (I say guy because we’re definitely dealing with a male here) is because he wants a movie that is not designed to be pornography to have elements that would be better placed in a pornographic movie. You are inserting a degree of kink shaming into the post that doesn’t actually exist. Watching pornography and having a healthy attitude about sex is different from wanting to sexualize a story that is not trying to be sexual. That is creepy.

Edit: deleted unnecessary sentence

I don’t disagree. But nuance like that is beyond most maganazis.

This is how your comment sounds: You see that picture of Hitler and the head of Mercedes? Forget about this Holocaust shit. Can you believe the head of Mercedes worked with the Nazis?! That’s who we really need to be focusing on… Forget Hitler!

See how stupid that sounds?

RDA defined my childhood. MacGyver and Stargate were two of my favorite television shows entirely due to that guy’s charisma.

Oops. Deleted my comment…I was trying to be funny because of your question but eggs on my face cuz you were actually responding to another post. So I just look like an asshole now

I would expect no lesser amount of socio/psychoanalysis of dick pic perspectives from a user named jballs!

Assuming you’re rescued. But there’s a chance you’ll get to die without answering another passive aggressive email…ahhh. one can dream.

I bet he would be a billionaire if not for Scientology.

I don’t know if you are correct or not… But you said it well.

Unrealistic fiction. You have to make your characters more believable. Ex: The ceo begrudgingly thought about someone besides a shareholder for approximately 3 seconds, farted, then signed an agreement to kill another grandmother.

I’ll stop interacting online outside of a professional context. So this obviously sucks from an online perspective. It’s will dampen online organization. But hopefully it increases community level interactions IRL. It’ll probably be good for day-to-day mental health.

Possibly. All you can do is step in the best direction you can see and hope for a better journey.

It’s the Daily Wire… That’s why.

Maybe that was the butterfly fart that pushed the fates towards a brighter tomorrow… If so, many thanks!