Except learning in this context is building a probability map reinforcing the exact text of the book. Given the right prompt, no new generative concepts come out, just the verbatim book text trained on.

So it depends on the model I suppose and if the model enforces generative answers and blocks verbatim recitation.

It requires drill down now and doesn’t list visits on the location itself which is a huge negative.

Apply the same material that is on the inside wires to the outside.

Likely with kid gloves

How about blocking this nonsense on Xbox? Need a pi hole yes?

None of that matters, as it’s a book… The problem is her as a person.

Honestly, no

Trolley problem nuance, and morons are downvoting you

To add to the other comment, the two concepts of an afterlife and punishment or reward are separate concepts and don’t have to coincide. Some faiths explicitly believe in heaven and not hell, and some neither.

Always remember when thinking about possibilities, given totally made up shit, the answer is always all possibilities exist and must be considered.

Why? We aren’t taking care of our people. I’m sure many of them feel the same way or close. Lots of people don’t want to live in misery, especially when they realize most of it is an actively created construct by others. If you combine that with the very common belief in an afterlife, it becomes a very obvious and likely path.

There are certain kinds of rules and discoveries that society can make that they must defend by making rules that eliminate anyone that dares bring the adverse ruling up again. You want slavery and propose it back into law? Society kills you for that.

Then fix the interest rates. Set them to 0% and do a mandatory income based repayment with a subsidy reduction from the graduating institution to incentivize them to help place graduates in better positions. If you hit the institutions with non-placement claw-back fees they will help.

Very depressing. We’re social animals, and being highly literate and informed while also socially apt, you really realize just how far apart you are from others, which is alienating, frustrating, and tiresome.

Nice he’s great.

I agree with your second point. I think civilized literate people have to have the nuanced discussion, and I agree the rest is just a hatred playbook.

That’s what taxes and public utilities are for. Convert them.

That’s the question I posed even though 8 people currently are illiterate and downvoted

Isn’t that the point though, that it affects the 99%?

If half are in each division, and if a few athletes out of 250,000 all perform in the top 1% or better because they switched to a protected division displacing 99%+ who don’t have arguable eligibility for that protected division…

I don’t know if that’s the statistic, but isn’t that the general concept? That it’s unfair to a huge number of other athletes that lose?

No regular user can configure anything. Most are barely literate and have the reading comprehension of a 6-8 year old.

Ai allows them to just say, turn down the brightness, turn down the volume, use this program to open this file from now on, which makes 10% configuration accessible to the 99% who otherwise would have 1% or less.

You won’t like the answer. If you don’t want to be lumped in with other magical thinkers, then don’t be a magical thinker, else you’re in the same boat and should be evaluated the same. All flavors are the same and all are destructive, just with differing exact details. It is possible to be a scientific thinker and be evil, but this can be changed with evidence on the whole, but it is not possible to be a magical thinker and to not contribute to evil, and those aspects cannot be changed as they are core to a faulty methodology of thinking which is pervasive, insidious, and pseudo-randomly aligned with changing educational theory. If you think it’s possible to only align magical thinking with benevolent acts, you’re wrong.

No true Scotsman. All religion is evil by nature of faith over evidence and magical thinking.