What do you mean? I’ve found their testing graphs especially to be very clear.
What do you mean? I’ve found their testing graphs especially to be very clear.
YouTube gives a b testing for YouTubers based on watch time, so they can tune their thumbnails to the one that gets the most watch time. The audience doesn’t always know the history of the chanel, they need to go off the thumbnail.
Linus didn’t say piracy is theft to my knowledge. He pirates a bunch of games.
You have I have very different ideas of tech illiterate. Most of the hosts have forgotten more than I care to learn. I guess if you work very technical tech stuff 24-7 you have a higher standard.
That’s the way that yields the longest combined watch time from the audience.
Do they go back and change thumbnails after a while? LTT does focus on a lot of evergreen content as well.
The only thing they could have done better was have the third party release the report. I don’t think they released it yet, but they had intended to at one point. Maybe the lawyers told them they shouldn’t?
Add blocking is piracy, but piracy is okay.
I wonder if those are less likely to be blocked on networks.
People would trade stocks with each other in between those hour intervals. It’d become another after hours trading. It might cut down on the change rate though since it’d make high frequency trading more annoying and cumbersome.
But slowing the refresh rate of trading I think would also make it take longer for stocks to settle after a shock. I think the limited trading windows is one of the things driving Bitcoins volatility? Increasing the time between when something happens and when the effect is felt would decrease the damping on the system.
Edit: sorry I missed the eli5, this is not a super simple answer
But if it’s a French place, they’ll pronounce it wrong.
They were supposed to be when they started, but I think they closed up pretty fast once there was money to be made.
The Queen/king and no one else.
Because Microsoft is updating to add ads to the 10 start menu is one reason. Security probably outweighs that, but it’s super annoying.
I thought the concern was manipulating public perception.
But Apple isn’t buying consumer ram, they’re spending $8 to put on a different chip instead. If other laptop manufacturers are charging $50, it’s because they think they can get away with it, like apple.
Might be fun for novelty on a concert venue or ball game, but I can’t imagine it’d be economical for solar farms.
It doesn’t even cost that for them.
Isn’t the guy at the zeroith table?