Lereddit hoomor

And ultimately if you are trying to macgyver together anti drone tech you are beyond fucked and should have spent that energy pursuing other means of privacy.

Super wholesome lol

https://youtu.be/X6OowkRjVLc

You’re cooked

It’s not percent of total it’s percent of daily recommendation. I’m not defending that choice but it just isn’t the same.

The perception among idiots is that there’s a trade-off with performance

“look what I can DO!”

What the fuck? Is that in your employment agreement? If not stop immediately

You think a person’s worth is tied to their genes. Pretty yuck. I disagreed and explained how.

For the record I was calling YOU out for linking a person to their genes, just not directly, trying to be courteous to the conversation.

Keep replying now, and you’re just slapfighting. Not worth it. I said in the last comment our positions are well known and the conversation is functionally concluded.

It’s a bad gene. It’s literally the contextually appropriate description of a factor involved in a situation.

Sorry it hurts your feelings

We’ve both made our points and opinions known here.

Why would there be communal ownership of personal goods? The stuff is alexi 's

I mean if it’s a damaged or failed it’s a bad gene. It caused ms!

It’s not shitting on a person, it’s discussing a condition.

I can understand that discussion can lead to eugenics style thoughts.

“Oh that person has tons of bad genes, they therefore are bad”. That’s wrong though, a person can have a super fucked up body but it doesn’t change their value or goodness.

When discussing a condition, the genes that improve or cause that condition can be described as good or bad.

Context matters.

Weird almost duplicate replies

Yes but those in the coops have their own possessions. Certainly if you try to take away something as basic as the food they intend to eat themselves they are going to have limits.

A co op for managing the profits and work of a business makes great sense. But even hard core communists want their own pants and shoes and would be reluctant to give away thier own needs.

Obviously a deal communes drive towards is provide based on your ability, be provided to based on your needs.

I think the meme pushes on the perception of the individual of their “needs” (real or hypothetical)

Edit the point is the meme is all about personal possessions, to use the keywords of the replies.

It’s an article about curing baldness, all context is pre determined.

Like sure, if we’re just bringing anything up, why care about baldness when I can’t breathe underwater, or if I can’t raise the dead?

If the topic is undesired head hair loss, “bad” appropriately describes the genes that may contribute to that. The discussion is limited by the context to avoiding hair loss, it isn’t a universal conversation on cosmetics

Why would you post this comment multiple times instead of googling it? 🦭🦭🦭

Unfortunately, looks like buying Twitter was a very effective choice if you take profit off the priority list

Dial it up. Hater can block you and the panel made me happy

My God my general but shallow knowledge of many things will grow more powerful