Some would call the former command cat abuse.
it 100% is, its just a bad habit of mine
I transcribe posts over on c/microblogmemes along with whatever else i feel like transcribing
Some would call the former command cat abuse.
it 100% is, its just a bad habit of mine
i was doing cat ~/.bash_history | grep thing
which is stupid so i started doing grep "thing" ~/.bash_history
now you’re telling me i should do history | grep thing
i can’t win
I do not understand how anyone uses mobile apps with ads. thats just so dystopian to me
I alias rm to rm -r for easy folder deleting
Microsoft Teams
I need to go out to the desert and deliver vegetables and other produce every Friday.
Now that would be fucking awesome. love driving
“walk around, come on our streets, and demand our children”
someone’s projecting
Should we all stop wearing any red baseball caps?
Genuine question, not really debating you
I know involuntary commitments have been horribly abused in the past.
It’s not all in the past. They are still abused today.
Not every religious person wants to commit mass murder.
No, because that person is not able to have any say in the matter (they are unconcious). All we can do is operate in their best interest, by getting them medical help.
However, a person with mental illness is concious (in this case) and can advocate for themselves and we shouldn’t deny them the right to do so. That would be oppression.
Do you think all schizophrenic people should be forcefully medicated even if they don’t pose a threat to others? Because a lot of religious people aren’t a threat to anybody. They aren’t all extremists.
I agreed up until the end. Forcefully medicating people into a “barely functional stupor” is a horrific human rights violation.
“Free software” is different from “software that is free”
Yeah idk what it is about them, but old people love to ramble on about anything and everything. I kind of like it honestly, I can just listen to their infodumping and occasionally say short sentences and phrases and they keep the entire conversation going for me.
Not suprising, they already did a hit and run on a cyclist and pedestrian in LA.
Why does it say “OpenAI’s large language model GPT-4o told a user who identified themself to it as a former addict named Pedro to indulge in a little meth.” when the article says it’s Meta’s Llama 3 model?
Why not pdf?