I could understand if 1 was the public position while 2 was the one you speak only among like-minded folk. Then 1 serves as something that makes nazism and other far right ideologies more palatable. Is it the case for Nick Fuentes? I don’t know enough about him.

I always found weird the position some far right people take that

1. The Nazis didn’t genocide the Jews
2. The Jews should be genocided

Why bother defending 1 if you believe 2?

A lot of the far right in fact.

This cracks me up, why is there a bunch separated from the rest?

GNU is Not Unix

I don’t really understand where the very specific idea of kiwi farming comes from, but I can confirm old 4chan users are here. I’m one of them. I’ve never been misogynistic or racist however. I was more into the freedom, randomness, otaku culture and activism for civic liberties. There’s a preconceived notion of what a 4chan user is, and I understand where it comes from.

Exceptionally heroic characters who do not have a royal title can also be included.

“Butter made from carbon”

Isn’t that what we had for thousands of years?

everyone should be free to decide for themselves who they are attracted to.

I can decide that?! How can I do that?

Yea I thought that was funny.

In reality, I guess it’s some bigoted view on homosexuality. Like “it can be OK if they are monogamous, secretive, don’t flount it, respect gender norms, stay far from children, and tried to not be gay for long time before giving in”. Probably.

I had no idea those actually were words.

They’re only thinking of the eventual harm done to actors, or, victims, in the case of child porn.

Where I live (east of Montreal), people who’s house is in front of a rail line complained about a train mass transit project that was in development before being severely altered because of NIMBYs.

…

Sorry, I misread your comment.

deleted by creator

Also, they have excellent music.

Apart from Denmark. I know only one band from there.

Thank you for your insightful reply.

I also found this: https://www.citizensforethics.org/news/analysis/trumps-politicization-of-the-u-s-marshals-service-is-a-threat-to-our-democracy/

It says that one of the primary functions of the US Marshals Service is to carry out judicial orders, but it reports to the president. This looks like a flaw to me.

Sorry, I’m a foreigner and I don’t understand much. Someone cares to explain? Should the police normally enforce judicial orders and sentences? Why do they not? Is the police personally loyal to Trump?

It’s a gnome foot though.

Nice. In what year(s) did you have your first computer?