• Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I was going to say “forget shame, this is illegal!” And then remembered that hasn’t stopped them either…

      • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Not sure if /s or not but The STOCK Act is explicitly to prevent insider trading for members of Congress…

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I must have missed the part where members actually get charged, and convicted, for insider trading. If no one gets convicted under the law, is it really a law?

          Wikipedia only lists one person, in 2019, in the last several decades that has been convicted of insider trading.

          Honestly, I’m not sure why members aren’t just required to have investments be completely managed by a third party where they have no input on any specifics. They simply have too much influence and knowledge on what is going to happen to be allowed to manage their own investments while in office.

          • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah, while it was implemented, it relies on a sort of self endorcement to work… and what seems to happen is more along the lines of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’.

            And agree - in an ideal world, all politicians’ investments should be managed by an independent third party to avoid conflicts of interest along with prevention of insider trading.