• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The people setting those fires should absolutely be charged for their actions. But their actions don’t negate the Constitutional rights of everyone else who is protesting. And calling in the National guard before the local authorities have declared the situation to be out of their control, is a direct violation of Constitutional law.

        • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          But, when you say, “they”…you are painting the entire protest as violent, unless you make the distinction that it isn’t. And the vast majority of protestors are simply exercising their 1st amendment rights, in a perfectly legal manner.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I never said they were violent, I haven’t heard of anything violent (edit: from the protesters) yet personally. There’s a difference between peaceful, not peaceful, and violent.

            If there’s enough bad actors doing things like setting cars on fire, then it warrants a larger police presence (but not the national guard at this level or ever the military)

            Edit: Just to add clarity, it warrants a larger police presence, because they are in fact no longer peaceful. Sure most people are, but the protest itself isn’t.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Impressive how the troll farms always manage to put one “yeah people were hurt but what about property?!” in every thread about our pigs.