Corporate VPN startup Tailscale secures $230 million CAD Series C on back of “surprising” growth
betakit.com
Company achieves $2 billion CAD valuation after doubling customer base in 10 months.

Corporate VPN startup Tailscale secures $230 million CAD Series C on back of “surprising” growth

Pennarun confirmed the company had been approached by potential acquirers, but told BetaKit that the company intends to grow as a private company and work towards an initial public offering (IPO).

“Tailscale intends to remain independent and we are on a likely IPO track, although any IPO is several years out,” Pennarun said. “Meanwhile, we have an extremely efficient business model, rapid revenue acceleration, and a long runway that allows us to become profitable when needed, which means we can weather all kinds of economic storms.”

Keep that in mind as you ponder whether and when to switch to self-hosting Headscale.

  • kratoz29@lemm.eeEnglish
    151·
    11 hours ago

    I mainly use Tailscale (and Zerotier) to access my CGNATED LAN, headscale will require me to pay a subscription for a VPS wouldn’t it?

    I really envy the guys who say only use them because they’re lazy to open ports or want a more secure approach, I use them because I NEED them lol.

    If (when?) Tailscale enshitify I’ll stick with ZT a bit until it goes the same way lol, I started using it 1st, I don’t know if ZT came before Tailscale though.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pubEnglish
        2·
        4 hours ago

        Same, my Hetzner proxy running NPM, with pivpn and pihole is doing all it needs to do for $3 and some change.

        My only open ports on anything I own are 80, 443 and the wg port I changed on that system. Love it.

        • Croquette@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          1·
          3 hours ago

          How does WG work on the local side of the network? Do you need to connect each VM/CT to the wireguard instance?

          I am currently setting up my home network again, and my VPS will tunnel through my home network and NPM will be run locally on the local VLAN for services and redirect from there.

          I wonder if there is any advantage to run NPM on the VPS instead of locally?

    • not_amm@lemmy.mlEnglish
      7·
      11 hours ago

      Same. I mean, I was already looking to rent a VPS, but at least there’s some time so I can save money until things get weird.

      • kratoz29@lemm.eeEnglish
        3·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, don’t get me wrong, I can see value of getting a VPS, especially if you are gonna be using it for some other projects, I have had a DO instance in the past and I thinkered with WG back then BTW, but if it is only for remote accessing your home LAN, I don’t feel like paying for it tbh, especially when some users get it for free (public IPv4) and it feels even dumber for me since I have a fully working IPv6 setup!

        BTW my ISP is funny, no firewall at all with it, I almost fainted when I noticed everyone could access my self hosted services with the IPv6 address and I did nothing regarding ports or whatsoever… They were fully accessible once I fired up the projects! I think I read an article about this subject… But I can’t recall when or where… I had to manually set up a firewall, which tbh, you always should do and it is especially easy to do in a Synology NAS.

        Anyway, back to the mesh VPN part, if they enshitify so be it, but in the meantime we still can benefit from it.

        • tux7350@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          4 hours ago

          Thats just how IPv6 works. You get a delegate address from your ISP for your router and then any device within that gets it own unique address. Considering how large the pool is, all address are unique. No NAT means no port forwarding needed!