Corporate VPN startup Tailscale secures $230 million CAD Series C on back of “surprising” growth

Pennarun confirmed the company had been approached by potential acquirers, but told BetaKit that the company intends to grow as a private company and work towards an initial public offering (IPO).

“Tailscale intends to remain independent and we are on a likely IPO track, although any IPO is several years out,” Pennarun said. “Meanwhile, we have an extremely efficient business model, rapid revenue acceleration, and a long runway that allows us to become profitable when needed, which means we can weather all kinds of economic storms.”

Keep that in mind as you ponder whether and when to switch to self-hosting Headscale.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Are there better alternatives? I was planning on using tailscale until now. :P

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      15 hours ago

      For me personally, the next step is using Headscale - a FOSS replacement of the Tailscale control server. The Tailscale clients are already open source and can be used with Headscale.

      Someone else could give other suggestions.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve been meaning to switch from Tailscale to Headscale but I have been to busy. Do you have any instructions, write-ups/walk-thrus you could recommend to set this up? I have three sites with 1GB internet I can use. One has a whole house UPS but dynamic IP, another has a static IP but no UPS, and the third is Google fiber with no UPS, but I can use the app to get the current IP anytime. I also own a number of domain names I could use.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          No writeups. I tried following the Headscale doc for a test last year. Set it up on the smallest DigitalOcean VM. Worked fine. Didn’t use a UI, had to add new clients via CLI on the server. When I set it up for real, I’d likely setup a UI as well and put it in a cloud outside of the US. It would work at home too but any other connection would die if my home internet dies or the power does. E.g. accessing one laptop from another, or accessing the off-site backup location.

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A bunch really, Headscale with Tailscale client, Nebula VPN, Netmaker, Zerotier.

    • MangoPenguin@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Wireguard if you’re just using it yourself. Many various ways to manage it, and it’s built in to most routers already.

      Otherwise Headscale with one of the webUIs would be the closest replacement.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Pivpn is really easy, and since pivpn is just scripts, it always installs current wireguard even if they lax on updating pivpn that often.

    • 4k93n2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      ive been eyeing up netbird but havnt got around to trying it yet. its fully open source at least, and theyre based in germany is anyone cares about that

      • hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        i used netbird heavily at my last job and i use it for a few things at home. it works pretty well.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Just looked at NetBird, it looks suspiciously similar to Tailscale in what it does except they also got an open-source control server. They have self-hosting doc right in their web site. Looks interesting. Can’t find much about the company other than it’s based in Berlin and it’s currently private - Wiretrustee UG.

        • nfh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          What’s the difference with their open-source control server, from headscale? That it’s officially published by the company?

    • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I use the built in wireguard VPN in my router. If you just need local network access elsewhere it’s usually really easy to setup if your router provides it. I would look into it!

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I use Nebula. It’s lightweight, well-engineered and fully under your control. But you do need a computer with a fixed IP and accessible port. (E.g. a cheap VPS)

      You can also use “managed nebula” if you want to enjoy the same risk of the control point of your network depending on a new business ;-)