• neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I disagree with the morality of personalized motorized transportation. Yet I don’t stand on a fucking highway and then make a surprised pikachu face when I get arrested.

    This was what always was going to happen. They knew this was always going to happen. This is nothing to be surprised by, this whole action is just a publicity stunt.

    • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Do you see how these two are not equivalent though? One is an aggressive campaign exterminate a people, that can be stopped if just slightly more political will is mustered.

      Already, the tide is turning and you have even mainstream voices yapping at Israel to cease.

      • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago
        1. It’s about the logic consequence of an action, so they are equivalent.

        2. If we go by the logic of “kills a lot of people and can be stopped quickly” then motorized transport is a lot worse. It kills a lot more people yearly and has multiple viable longterm solution that just need to be implemented.

        • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Do fastfood next.

          But no, I’m not getting into that fight with you, because it’s an argument without heart meant only to sap the will of people to oppose a very real and concerted genocide.

          What do you propose to stop the genocide instead of morally defensible illegal acts?