• nimisnimi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Calling other people (all the more, a nation as a whole) names - is not critical thinking.

      Presenting biased rhethorics (all the more, not in a neutral manner, but emotionally loaded claims) and ommitting any contradicting points - has nothing to do with critical thinking.

      Opinions vs facts. One-sided accusing vs rational thinking. 💁

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah no. Calling Nazis Nazi is a perfectly rational take. One does not to condemn an active genocide “in a neutral manner,” neither do Nazis deserve neutrality.

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They’re just here trolling. The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi. Israel’s finance minister said they intend to “entirely destroy” Gaza, and the English language has a word for “something you entirely destroy by fire”: it’s ‘holocaust’.

          So, I think we should trigger this guy more by using the term in the original, objective sense:

          This genocide, to which all current supporters of the Zionist state of Israel are party, is intentionally making a holocaust of Gaza.

          ETA: Let the record reflect that the denial of any genocide when shown such irrefutable evidence, — whether the Holocaust against Poles, Jews and others of the 40s, or this genocide of Palestinians — makes you party to its crimes.