kingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1785arrow-down18
arrow-up1777arrow-down1imageOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.workskingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 hours agoSchadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 hours agoI mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-29 hours agoZe fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke! Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).
It’s actually Schadenfreude
Schadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
Do you mean silent as in ilent?
I mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
Ze fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke!
Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).