A bill to ban the use of the mineral in public water passed the Florida House 88-27. It now awaits Gov. Ron DeSantis’ signature.

Lawmakers in Florida gave final passage to a bill to ban fluoride in public water systems Tuesday, with the state House voting 88-27.

SB 700, also known as the Florida Farm Bill, doesn’t mention the word “fluoride,” but it would effectively ban the chemical compound by preventing “the use of certain additives in a water system.” The bill awaits Gov. Ron DeSantis’ signature.

If DeSantis, a Republican, signs the bill, Florida will become the second state to ban fluoride from water supplies.

  • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The UK largely doesn’t fluoridate, so this is one of the (few) areas where the US actually does better than the UK. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fluoridation_by_country

    The UK does generally have better tooth health in the grand scheme of things, but it’s actually pretty close, and the US is still really high on the list.

    https://www.yongeeglintondental.com/blog/healthy-primary-teeth/

    Without checking, I suspect the US’s slightly higher cavity rate is more down to sugar consumption than received dental care.

    • Underbroen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Did you read the rest of the Wikipedia article? How is better to add fluoride in the amounts the US does? It says in the Wikipedia article:

      Recent studies suggest that water fluoridation, particularly in industrialized countries, may be unnecessary because topical fluorides (such as in toothpaste) are widely used and cavity rates have become low. For this reason, some scientists consider fluoridation to be unethical due to the lack of informed consent. However, a recent study funded by NHS found no significant difference between individuals who receive fluoridated water and those who don’t in terms of missing teeth and reducing social inequities.

      Also, new research highlights that high levels of fluoride is problematic for pregnant women (it affect cognitive abilities of the unborn child).

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I found this good review article based on a study commissioned by the Canadian government.

        https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408444.2023.2295338

        It seems like potential IQ effects are still difficult to distinguish as a dose response, so they weren’t able to come up with a point of departure. It doesn’t help that in a lot of studies comparing “high” and “low” fluoridation effects on IQ, the “low” is still higher than the WHO recommended level of 1.5 mg/L, and the US recommended level of 0.75.

        I think the optimal level is likely going to vary by municipality based on the quality of dental care and the use of fluoridated toothpaste (that everyone overuses), and consumption of high fluoride beverages like tea. I guess my main takeaway is that people need to read their local water quality report, and do what they will with that information

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      and also dental care isnt usually covered by most insurance so people try to ignore the problem til its too late.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Vision insurance is also completely useless.

          “Whoops, your prescription is too strong. We only cover glasses for the mildly blind.”

          I stopped signing up for vision insurance when it was cheaper to do some “two for one frames” deal without insurance.