Summary

U.S. officials have warned European allies against excluding American defense firms from EU weapons tenders, amid new EU proposals to boost domestic arms production.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized U.S. concerns in recent meetings, citing potential negative repercussions if U.S. companies are sidelined.

The EU’s €150 billion ReArm Europe plan aims to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers as Trump signals reduced U.S. NATO engagement.

Washington sees the move as conflicting with its goal of selling arms abroad. Tensions highlight diverging transatlantic defense priorities under Trump’s leadership.

  • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Nah, as an American, fuck the US government and US arms dealers. They don’t get to fuck over our allies and demand profit out of them in the war machine they keep moving. Especially with them joining the axis of evil and aiding Israel’s genocide of Palestine.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    US arms companies have been fighting basic laws like gun licenses for years. The results are thousands of dead children. Fuck them companies.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The amount of mixed signals coming from this administration is insane.

    Like you want to tariff us but if we fight back you say nah fam not like that.

    America should be shunned out of society and can make deals with Russia and North Korea.

    It’s about time people saw America for the bullies they are and sever ties with them.

    Cunts.

    • lowleekun@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It is logical if you accept that america has a fascist government. That is how fascism works, put pressure on other countries, bully them and if they do not comply you can point to them for politcal gain. After a while of “warning” and pretending that the other countries are enemies (all so your population gets riled up) you can start wars.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The amount of mixed signals coming from this administration is insane.

      No, seems pretty straightforward. It’s simply “we’ll tariff-whip you into submission and make you buy our shit”

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Careful EU. Remember what the US did in Iraq when Saddam was going to switch from the dollar to the Euro.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “We don’t need other countries!”

    “Hey, you other countries can’t do that, we need you!”

  • Comtief@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Did they not just ask Europeans to up our defense spending? Getting a lot of mixed messages here… Fools.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They meant they wanted Europe to buy a bunch of overpriced American fighter jets

  • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    There are no patent limitations on manufacturing M16s. It’s a solid, proven, affordable design. Europe is a manufacturing powerhouse, with plenty of superb weapons manufacturers who don’t even need to use Stoner’s design. They risk absolutely nothing.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      The argument against the M16 right now is that an intermediate caliber rifle can’t do anything against modern body armor (Edit: and to the other poster, this also applies to the HK416). Works if you’re shooting poor brown people, but not anyone with a well equipped military. The US itself is in the middle of replacing the M16 for this reason.

      When the XM7 was being developed, there was a chance the whole thing was a mistake if a near-peer war never happened. Now the likelihood of a near-peer war is looking more likely.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Why would Europe manufacture M16s? HK416s are superior, in that most NATO armies, including the US has adopted it.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Because it’s free. H&K is expensive. I imagine they still hold parents on the HK416 and might prevent other manufacturers from making them. No such restrictions exist for the M16 or AR-15 anymore. While the HK416 may well be superior, there’s nothing wrong with the AR that hasn’t been addressed for years. And it might send a bit of a message if Europe starts building a bunch of them.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    1 day ago

    Uh, what the fuck did these geniuses think would happen? Repeatedly kick every one of our allies in the balls, and…then what? Things continue just status quo in every other aspect?

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably one of the top 10 Trump moments so far from the Oval Office “ we are going to make less capable aircraft for our allies. In case they aren’t our allies anymore in the future you never know.”

    • Trihilis@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair. That’s what’s basically been happening over the past 50 years. Just look at how we let Russia walk all over us. So it kinda makes sense for them to expect the same outcome.

      Their only problem is that since Europe is basically on its own now, Europe has to choose for european produce. We can deal with one shitty dictatorship trying to push us around. But now its two shitty dictatorships so yeah that kinda changes things around (finally).

    • nomoregerm@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      European here. We never were your allied, america’s soft power have been imposed on us. Screw you

    • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      “Warned against excluding”

      Wait until the US feels threatened by the EU and will need to invade to guarantee security for its citizens.

      Literally just russia 2.0

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        1 day ago

        it’s so weird being like “hey foreign invaders. i’ll help y’all out. i’m down for bing a canadian province. or maybe the netherlands, france, or spain can reclaim their claims? i’m also down to arm native americans. i’m very flexible. i’m just not okay with this

    • reev@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why would it change after that? They’ve clearly demonstrated they intend to just stab their allies in the back the second a bit of cash gets wiggled in front of their snouts.

  • MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a national security threat for the EU to buy American arms. All it takes is for a crazy US president to cut their supply when they’re most in need like the US did to Ukraine and they’re in trouble. The EU is right to exclude US arms. Trumps actions have consequences.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Warned”? What are you going to do, invade Europe for not buying our weapons? These chucklefucks legit think they own the world.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is the same US government that’s currently complaining it’s too difficult to do business in Quebec (a province of a country the US is threatening to invade) because native French speakers insist on speaking French. The US is demanding they use English.