• GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Are you sure it’s not bad from a technical perspective? I saw a story from a former programmer talking about how changes would be made the to the interface in the new settings app that’s trying to replace control panel and the shit was like a horror story.

      • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        The windows kernel isn’t all that great, particularly in the realm of memory security or scheduling.

        You know, to each their own. Question is really whether windows maintaining a closed source kernel even makes sense from a maintenance burden perspective when it really doesn’t give them much money in return. (Most of their money in 2025 comes from cloud services, not operating systems)

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Mostly because Microsoft tries to maintain backwards compatibility to ridiculous extents, and their customers grew accustomed to it so they kinda rely on it, no ?

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      maybe, but there are also things it arguably does better than Linux, e.g. user access control

      (If you can still find this story, I’d be very interested in it, please do link to it here.)