Kayn@dormi.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoJavaScript's days are numbereddormi.zoneimagemessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1681arrow-down114file-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1667arrow-down1imageJavaScript's days are numbereddormi.zoneKayn@dormi.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square64fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarecall_me_xale@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up81arrow-down1·1 year agoBold of you to assume no one will come up with a replacement date library rather than just getting rid of JS.
minus-square__init__@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up71·1 year agoIt’s javascript. We’ll have gone through 275,760 new datetime libraries before then, it’ll be fine.
minus-squareRedkey@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoOf course! There’s already a proposal for a replacement Temporal object.
minus-squareThinker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt’s not just a proposal, it’s already fully defined and almost completely implemented - I believe they’re just waiting on a standards update from ISO for time zone stuff.
Bold of you to assume no one will come up with a replacement date library rather than just getting rid of JS.
It’s javascript. We’ll have gone through 275,760 new datetime libraries before then, it’ll be fine.
String based date processing
Of course! There’s already a proposal for a replacement Temporal object.
It’s not just a proposal, it’s already fully defined and almost completely implemented - I believe they’re just waiting on a standards update from ISO for time zone stuff.