In the United States, I’d probably name Oregon City, the famous end of the Oregon Trail and the first city founded west of the Rocky Mountains during the pioneer era. Its population is only 37,000.

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Thanks, fixed the link.

    When you consider that the top 5 on that list take up 50% of the population. Auckland continues to grow, and at 30% of the population already, it has an crazy effect on the economic decisions in the country.

    It is also growing geographically, eventually Auckland and Hamilton will merge somewhere around Huntly (#50).

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Huh, so it does. It looks like it shouldn’t at first, my bad.

      Have you had any luck with the urban sprawl? We’ve brought in a bunch of urban densification stuff recently in Canada, and NZ was cited as an example to follow.

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Auckland is the definition of sprawl.

        A bunch of laws were past on the last few years to combat it, but we find see the effects for decades to come.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          I remember going to Auckland in the 90s and being amazed how low everything was considering it’s size. Wellington was vertical. Auckland was horizontal.

          At least, that’s how it felt.