• mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    since when is Bin Laden + a couple of goons the whole people of Saudi Arabia ?

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You forgot the part where Saudi Arabia started courting American aid and literally expelled Bin Laden for being anti-American. That doesn’t make SA “the good guys” but it makes a huge difference in how your framing paints SA’s position and involvement with Al Qaeda during the 2000s. Their history is long and complicated, but during the war on terror, SA was much more aligned with the US against Al Qaeda and Bin Laden

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Saudi Arabia, the people who

          Yes, in reference to “Saudi Arabia”, which refers to their government

          I added the comma for clarification, but that’s what was said

          They didn’t say “the people of Saudi Arabia did 9/11”

    • Denjin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The international mujahadeen movement was born in Saudi Arabia; funded by Saudi Arabia; created out of a quasi death cult of islam called Wahabism founded in Saudi Arabia; bin Laden was a major figure in Saudi politics and society and from one of the richest, non-Royal families in the country; almost all the members of Al-Queda were Saudi.

      If Saudi foreign policy and money created the mujahadeen, then they are Saudi.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        You forgot the part where Saudi Arabia started courting American aid and literally expelled Bin Laden for being anti-American. That doesn’t make SA “the good guys” but it makes a huge difference in how your framing paints SA’s position and involvement with Al Qaeda during the 2000s. Their history is long and complicated, but during the war on terror, SA was much more aligned with the US against Al Qaeda and Bin Laden

        • Denjin@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Of course, it’s far too nuanced an issue to boil down in a couple of sentences but such is the nature of online discourse.

          I see Al quaeda, and in a more general sense, Sunni extremism as a whole as the child of Saudi Arabia. The bombing of the US Cole was probably the point when the Saudi regime realised that exporting Salafist Jihad abroad had bigger consequences than they intended (attack regional opponents like Israel and Iran) and that it was quickly getting out of control and so they attempted to distance themselves in case America and Britain turned around and cut off their military aid.

          • Soleos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not sure how much the kingdom was involved in Al Qaeda’s early years, unless you count American-Saudi-British funding of MAK/other Mujahideen during the soviet-afghan war. However, it’s clear Al Qaeda was already declaring against the kingdom a couple years before the USS Cole in '98. But sure I’d see Al Qaeda being a child of SA in a way similar to the KKK being a child of the US