Jaromil@fed.dyne.org to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoOff by one solitudefed.dyne.orgexternal-linkmessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up11.52Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.49Karrow-down1external-linkOff by one solitudefed.dyne.orgJaromil@fed.dyne.org to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAren’t those two the same thing? At least in C-style arrays, which might not be how they’re handled under the hood, but is at least how most languages present it to the programmer.
minus-squareReversalHatchery@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoin my understanding offset is technically the “relative index”, or how much you have to go further
minus-squarelefixxx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year agoYes they are presented in the programmer wrong. The first thing in memory should have offset 0 and index 1
Aren’t those two the same thing? At least in C-style arrays, which might not be how they’re handled under the hood, but is at least how most languages present it to the programmer.
in my understanding offset is technically the “relative index”, or how much you have to go further
Yes they are presented in the programmer wrong. The first thing in memory should have offset 0 and index 1